2020
DOI: 10.3384/ecp2016928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Benchmark of Modelica Time-Domain Power System Automated Simulations using Python

Abstract: In this paper, a benchmark between solvers and Modelica tools for time-domain simulations of a power system model is presented. A Python-based approach is employed to automate Modelica simulations and compute performance metrics. This routine is employed to compare the performance of a commercial (Dymola) against an open-source (OpenModelica) simulation tool with different solver settings. Python scripts are developed to execute a dynamic simulation of a common model for power system studies with 49 states and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Open Instance Power System Library (OpenIPSL) is an open-source library of power system component models written entirely in Modelica (Baudette et al 2018). Beyond the inherent advantages of the Modelica language, OpenIPSL components are constantly crossvalidated against commercial packages such as PSS/E, producing practically the same results (Laera 2016) and exhibiting the same or even better simulation performance (see Henningsson, Olsson, and Vanfretti (2019) and Dorado-Rojas, Navarro Catalán, et al (2020)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Open Instance Power System Library (OpenIPSL) is an open-source library of power system component models written entirely in Modelica (Baudette et al 2018). Beyond the inherent advantages of the Modelica language, OpenIPSL components are constantly crossvalidated against commercial packages such as PSS/E, producing practically the same results (Laera 2016) and exhibiting the same or even better simulation performance (see Henningsson, Olsson, and Vanfretti (2019) and Dorado-Rojas, Navarro Catalán, et al (2020)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%