1993
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199306000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance, Characteristics, and Case Mix in Japanese and American Teaching Hospitals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the major limitation of this study is its inclusion of only two hospitals. Although the LOS patterns identified in the study are consistent with the other available studies on hospital LOS in the United States and Japan (10,11), our study is limited in its generalizability, especially beyond large, urban university hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the major limitation of this study is its inclusion of only two hospitals. Although the LOS patterns identified in the study are consistent with the other available studies on hospital LOS in the United States and Japan (10,11), our study is limited in its generalizability, especially beyond large, urban university hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…2 Few empirical studies have focused specifically on the patterns and determinants of LOS in U.S. and Japanese hospitals. Ishikawa and colleagues (10), comparing two hospitals, one in Japan and the other in the United States, reported that the average LOS was four to eight times higher at the Japanese hospital for four International Classification of Disease categories. Fukuhara and Norton (11) compared three teaching hospitals, one in Japan and two in the United States, and reported that the average LOS for acute myocardial infarction was more than three times higher at the Japanese hospital.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An early example studying patients at a Japanese and an American teaching hospital found that the Japanese LOS was much longer, and the US costs per patient higher; however, the longer Japanese LOS tended to reduce the total cost per patient gap. 4 Another contribution, that examined differences in outcomes for patients hospitalized for six diagnoses in three European countries and three American states, revealed significant variation in readmission rates. 5 Recent research comparing LOS and mortality after surgery of elderly hip fracture patients in three Japanese and two American hospitals found that while the US LOS was much shorter, mortality was significantly higher in that country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One innovative approach used by the Health BASKET project compared diagnostic related group (DRG) systems in nine European Union (EU) member states using 10-case vignettes and questionnaires regarding the cost and services that patients would have received [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. One research compared Japanese and American teaching hospitals by the mean and median of total cost actually incurred for several diseases [13]. Another showed costs incurred for treating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients by cost categories such as radiology, laboratory, drugs etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%