2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6613-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance characterization of Ti substrate lead dioxide electrode with different solid solution interlayers

Abstract: In this study, Ti substrate was coated by three different mixed oxides (SnO 2 -Sb 2 O 5 , RuO 2 -TiO 2 , IrO 2 -Ta 2 O 5 ), then PbO 2 was electrodeposited on them to prepare PbO 2 electrode. The microstructure of the solid solution interlayers and PbO 2 coatings was characterized by scanning electronic microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The results indicated that the above oxides interlayer exited in the form of solid solution and the interlayer covered the Ti substrate largely. Accelerated life test proved th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristic signals of IrO 2 disappeared after subsequent multiple junction fabrication; this is also consistent with the EDS analysis. The surficial XRD profiles of the BiO x /TiO 2 anode showed peaks from anatase TiO 2 (2θ = 25⁰) and α-phase Bi 2 O 3 (2θ = 33⁰), whose diffraction intensities were much lower than the Ir 0.73 Ta 0.27 O[31] reported comparable results where a heterojunction deposition of PbO 2 thin layer showed negligible effects on the OER activity of IrO 2 -Ta 2 O 5 anode. Considering the substantial loading (thickness) of the outer BiO x /TiO 2 layer, the electron transfer towards the underlying Ir components is suspected to be governed by a bulk-limited conduction, rather than an electron tunneling as in the case of ultrathin TiO 2 film[32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The characteristic signals of IrO 2 disappeared after subsequent multiple junction fabrication; this is also consistent with the EDS analysis. The surficial XRD profiles of the BiO x /TiO 2 anode showed peaks from anatase TiO 2 (2θ = 25⁰) and α-phase Bi 2 O 3 (2θ = 33⁰), whose diffraction intensities were much lower than the Ir 0.73 Ta 0.27 O[31] reported comparable results where a heterojunction deposition of PbO 2 thin layer showed negligible effects on the OER activity of IrO 2 -Ta 2 O 5 anode. Considering the substantial loading (thickness) of the outer BiO x /TiO 2 layer, the electron transfer towards the underlying Ir components is suspected to be governed by a bulk-limited conduction, rather than an electron tunneling as in the case of ultrathin TiO 2 film[32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The q* PbO 2 -0.2 M. Larger activity surface area led to higher electrochemical activity on oxygen evolution. 36…”
Section: Electrochemical Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…021-1272). This suggests that these dioxides are mainly present in the solid solution because they possess the same valence and similar ionic radius, which means they satisfy the Hume-Rothery conditions for the formation of a substitution solid solution [17,18]. It is therefore rational that the X-ray diffractograms of the mixed oxides show slight shift in the peak positions.…”
Section: Xrd Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%