2017 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/vppc.2017.8330930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Comparison between Conventional and Robust Control for the Powertrain of an Electric Vehicle Propelled by a Switched Reluctance Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For velocity or torque control, different control strategies are suggested [12]. Direct and indirect torque control are among the control strategies.…”
Section: Srm Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For velocity or torque control, different control strategies are suggested [12]. Direct and indirect torque control are among the control strategies.…”
Section: Srm Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct and indirect torque control are among the control strategies. The control strategy selected for the velocity control is based on two cascade control loops: velocity and current loops [12]. Figure 4 shows the block diagram of this control strategy.…”
Section: Srm Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is noteworthy that the use of SRMs in traction of electric vehicles is gaining ground [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Actually such motors are less costly, less prone to failure and more convenient to install and maintain than Permanent Magnet motors [27][28][29][30][31]. However, it should not be overlooked that due to the nonlinearities in SRMs electric dynamics induced by the simultaneous activation of several stator phases, the control of these motors remains an open and challenging problem [32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%