2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0066849
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of a 9-kW magnetically shielded Hall thruster operating on xenon and krypton

Abstract: The performance of a 9-kW class magnetically shielded Hall thruster operating on xenon and krypton propellants is experimentally characterized. Thrust and efficiency measurements performed at discharge powers ranging from 4.5 to 9 kW indicate that the anode efficiency of krypton is 9%–18% lower than that of xenon. This difference is comparable to previous measurements reported for unshielded Hall thrusters, although it is found that unlike in previous studies, the efficiency ratio widens with increasing discha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ion current density trace as a function of angle from the centerline of a Hall effect thruster at a location 1 m downstream of the thruster. Reprinted from [30], with the permission of AIP Publishing.…”
Section: Mass Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ion current density trace as a function of angle from the centerline of a Hall effect thruster at a location 1 m downstream of the thruster. Reprinted from [30], with the permission of AIP Publishing.…”
Section: Mass Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, probe-based methods to perform local measurements have shown in some cases to perturb the plasma properties [29]. All experimental measurements were collected while the H9 was operating at 300 V and 15 A on xenon [23,30].…”
Section: Thrustermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hall2De parameters for reported simulations, chosen to match experimental operating conditions from[30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, other cost-effective propellants must demonstrate acceptable performance in electric propulsion devices to justify a change in propellant choice. Many studies have thus investigated the performance and underlying physics for operation with various propellants such as iodine [8], krypton (Kr) [9][10][11][12][13][14], water vapor [15,16], diatomic nitrogen (N 2 ), air [17,18], and argon (Ar) [19,20]. Among them, Kr (83.8 amu), which is the next heaviest noble gas to Xe (131.3 amu), is widely studied and reported to generally provide higher specific impulse due to the lighter mass at a low cost [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have thus investigated the performance and underlying physics for operation with various propellants such as iodine [8], krypton (Kr) [9][10][11][12][13][14], water vapor [15,16], diatomic nitrogen (N 2 ), air [17,18], and argon (Ar) [19,20]. Among them, Kr (83.8 amu), which is the next heaviest noble gas to Xe (131.3 amu), is widely studied and reported to generally provide higher specific impulse due to the lighter mass at a low cost [13]. Similarly, Ar gas is also a promising propellant due to its even lower price than Kr.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%