2017
DOI: 10.22153/kej.2017.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Comparison of Different Advanced Control Schemes for Glucose Level Control under Disturbing Meal

Abstract: Abstract In this work, diabetic glucose concentration level control under disturbing meal has been controlled using two set of advanced controllers. The first set is sliding mode controllers (classical and integral) and the second set is represented by optimal LQR controllers (classical and Min-, ax). Due to their characteristic features of disturbance rejection, both integral sliding mode controller and LQR Minmax controller are dedicated here for comparison. The Bergman minimal mathematical model was u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(20) Depending on the desired performance, the parameters of the matrices H, R and Q are chosen by the designer and generally they are taken as unity matrices [6]. A summary for the calculation of the optimal LQR feedback matrix can be addressed by the steps below:  Selection of design parameter matrices and according to above argument,  Solution of the algebraic Riccati equation for matrix ,  Find the optimal state variable feedback gain matrix K using Eq.…”
Section: Optimal Minimax Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(20) Depending on the desired performance, the parameters of the matrices H, R and Q are chosen by the designer and generally they are taken as unity matrices [6]. A summary for the calculation of the optimal LQR feedback matrix can be addressed by the steps below:  Selection of design parameter matrices and according to above argument,  Solution of the algebraic Riccati equation for matrix ,  Find the optimal state variable feedback gain matrix K using Eq.…”
Section: Optimal Minimax Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When applying the adaptive control methods, the wing rock aerodynamic mechanism should be known; anyway, the aerodynamic model may not be easy to achieve [5]. Another approach in controlling dynamical systems is attempting to make the system performance to be optimal, in that way, researchers seek to design a controller, which satisfies the desired performance consuming the shortest time or less energy or both [6]. [7] Applied phase plane analysis and existence theorems to describe the overall system behavior in order to design an optimal controller to stabilize the delta wing aircraft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research in the orbit of insulin regulation system contained highly advanced control theory, that orbit sample represented by Reinforcement Learn-ing Algorithm as in [7], new module for the multivariable adaptive like in [8], Model-based falsification has dealt with the problem in [9], Robust glucose control via μ-synthesis has presented in [10], Hybrid Newton Observer has been assessed in Analysis of Glucose Regulation System in [11], Terminal Synergetic Control has been employed in the field as in [12], Backstepping sliding mode Gaussian insulin injection control also presented in [13] and lastly Super twisting control algorithm has presented in [14]. Biomedical applications managed by advanced control theory such the Insulin regulation systems are still struggling for new aspects for improving and enhancing the performance and robustness and that was the motivation of the present work [15], [16]. This work contribution is to introduce a design and comparison study among robust Insulin regulation system based on three sliding mode controllers under meal disturbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%