2014
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2014.2322880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Comparison of Differential Evolution, Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm in the Design of Circularly Polarized Microstrip Antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, for the sake of evaluation reliability, computational models utilized in the design process should incorporate environmental components such as connectors. A large variety of optimization algorithms have been utilized and proposed for antenna design, including local search methods (both gradient‐based, and derivative‐free) as well as global algorithms, mostly population‐based metaheuristics (genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimizers, differential evolution, etc.). Recently, surrogate‐based optimization methods have been applied for computationally‐efficient optimization of antenna structures, including compact antennas …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, for the sake of evaluation reliability, computational models utilized in the design process should incorporate environmental components such as connectors. A large variety of optimization algorithms have been utilized and proposed for antenna design, including local search methods (both gradient‐based, and derivative‐free) as well as global algorithms, mostly population‐based metaheuristics (genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimizers, differential evolution, etc.). Recently, surrogate‐based optimization methods have been applied for computationally‐efficient optimization of antenna structures, including compact antennas …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decades evolutionary algorithms have been widely used for parameter optimization in different engineering tasks [1][2][3]. Engineering optimization has been widely involved in aerospace sciences because of its practicality in obtaining optimal solutions in different challenging problems including dynamics and control of nonlinear systems [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, DE may suffer from premature convergence and/or slow convergence when solving complex multimodal optimization problems. In order to improve the performance of the conventional DE, a number of DE variants have been proposed in recent decades [2, 6, 10]. Recognizing that the performance of DE depends on the control parameters, Brest et al [11] presented a self-adaptive DE (jDE), in which both F and CR are created independently for each individual by an adaptive mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%