2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-019-0424-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of interpolation operators of multigrid methods based on distance weight and area (volume) intersection approaches Part I: Finite volume discretization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ey used the solver for 2D and 3D foils and showed that the method is 3 to 6 times faster than the baseline method while ensuring computational accuracy. Ha et al [24] in 2019 presented an interpolation operator on a multigrid method based on distance weight. e performance of the method was compared with that of an interpolation operator by area (volume) intersection 2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ey used the solver for 2D and 3D foils and showed that the method is 3 to 6 times faster than the baseline method while ensuring computational accuracy. Ha et al [24] in 2019 presented an interpolation operator on a multigrid method based on distance weight. e performance of the method was compared with that of an interpolation operator by area (volume) intersection 2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%