Performance comparison of modified AODV in reference point group mobility and random waypoint mobility models

Simaremare, Harris; Syarif, Abdusy; Abouaïssa, Abdelhafid; Sari, Riri Fitri; Lorenz, Pascal

doi:10.1109/icc.2013.6655100

Cited by 18 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are 15 source-destination pairs and each source transmits 2 packets per second with a Constant Bit Rate (CBR), and pause time 60s, which is the time nodes need to pause to begin travelling to the next destination with a speed of 10 m/s, the packet size is 512 bytes and the simulation time is 500s. The mobility model utilised in this paper is the random way point which is the most commonly used model in ad hoc networking research [34] It is easy to use and movement could be considered as realistic which is very similar to the real world movement [35]. However, the proposed model can fit any other type of mobility models like RPGM model [36].…”

Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recommendation Based Trust Model with an Effective Defence Scheme for MANETs

Shabut

Dahal

Bista

et al. 2015

IEEE Trans. on Mobile Comput.

137

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recommendation Based Trust Model with an Effective Defence Scheme for MANETs

Shabut

Dahal

Bista

et al. 2015

IEEE Trans. on Mobile Comput.

137

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…To provide a precise mobility model for STA and mesh nodes, we have designed and implemented RWWP (Random WayPoint Within Pre-defined path) model using PathAdHoc [ 34 ]. In contrast to the RWP (Random WayPoint), which has been used in many of the previous studies such as [ 35 ], PathAdHoc allows RWWP to provide a more realistic mobility model for WMNs. In fact, OMNET++ uses the generated output file of this tool as the input parameters for simulating the designed park in Fig.…”

Section: Simulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Promoting Wired Links in Wireless Mesh Networks: An Efficient Engineering Solution

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) cannot completely guarantee good performance of traffic sources such as video streaming. To improve the network performance, this study proposes an efficient engineering solution named Wireless-to-Ethernet-Mesh-Portal-Passageway (WEMPP) that allows effective use of wired communication in WMNs. WEMPP permits transmitting data through wired and stable paths even when the destination is in the same network as the source (Intra-traffic). Tested with four popular routing protocols (Optimized Link State Routing or OLSR as a proactive protocol, Dynamic MANET On-demand or DYMO as a reactive protocol, DYMO with spanning tree ability and HWMP), WEMPP considerably decreases the end-to-end delay, jitter, contentions and interferences on nodes, even when the network size or density varies. WEMPP is also cost-effective and increases the network throughput. Moreover, in contrast to solutions proposed by previous studies, WEMPP is easily implemented by modifying the firmware of the actual Ethernet hardware without altering the routing protocols and/or the functionality of the IP/MAC/Upper layers. In fact, there is no need for modifying the functionalities of other mesh components in order to work with WEMPPs. The results of this study show that WEMPP significantly increases the performance of all routing protocols, thus leading to better video quality on nodes.

show abstract

“…However, the analysis in [18] focuses on VANET with speeds of the order of 7 m/s, which is very low compared to our average of 55 m/s for UAANET. The analysis of Simaremare et al in [20] with respect to our concern is even more simplistic. They proposed an optimized version of AODV and then compared its performance under RWP and RPGM.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The observation is that AODV performs well under RD compared to the other mobility models, and their major conclusion is that AODV can be used for applications that tolerate a small amount of packet loss. Unfortunately, be it in [20] or in [21], no clear explanation is provided as to what feature or statistical behaviour of a given mobility model actually influences which aspect of the protocol.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unmanned Aerial ad Hoc Networks: Simulation-Based Evaluation of Entity Mobility Models’ Impact on Routing Performance

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An unmanned aerial ad hoc network (UAANET) is a special type of mobile ad hoc network (MANET). For these networks, researchers rely mostly on simulations to evaluate their proposed networking protocols. Hence, it is of great importance that the simulation environment of a UAANET replicates as much as possible the reality of UAVs. One major component of that environment is the movement pattern of the UAVs. This means that the mobility model used in simulations has to be thoroughly understood in terms of its impact on the performance of the network. In this paper, we investigate how mobility models affect the performance of UAANET in simulations in order to come up with conclusions/recommendations that provide a benchmark for future UAANET simulations. To that end, we first propose a few metrics to evaluate the mobility models. Then, we present five random entity mobility models that allow nodes to move almost freely and independently from one another and evaluate four carefully-chosen MANET/UAANET routing protocols: ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV), optimized link state routing (OLSR), reactive-geographic hybrid routing (RGR) and geographic routing protocol (GRP). In addition, flooding is also evaluated. The results show a wide variation of the protocol performance over different mobility models. These performance differences can be explained by the mobility model characteristics, and we discuss these effects. The results of our analysis OPEN ACCESSAerospace 2015, 2 393show that: (i) the enhanced Gauss-Markov (EGM) mobility model is best suited for UAANET; (ii) OLSR, a table-driven proactive routing protocol, and GRP, a position-based geographic protocol, are the protocols most sensitive to the change of mobility models; (iii) RGR, a reactive-geographic hybrid routing protocol, is best suited for UAANET.

show abstract

Performance comparison of modified AODV in reference point group mobility and random waypoint mobility models

Cited by 18 publications

References 8 publications

Recommendation Based Trust Model with an Effective Defence Scheme for MANETs

Recommendation Based Trust Model with an Effective Defence Scheme for MANETs

Promoting Wired Links in Wireless Mesh Networks: An Efficient Engineering Solution

Unmanned Aerial ad Hoc Networks: Simulation-Based Evaluation of Entity Mobility Models’ Impact on Routing Performance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About