Performance Comparison of Relay-Based Covert Communications: DF, CF and AF

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the performance of covert communications in different types of a relay system: decode-and-forward (DF), compress-and-forward (CF) and amplify-and-forward (AF). We consider a source node that attempts to send both public and covert messages to a destination node through a relay on which a covert message detector is embedded. By taking the minimum detection error probability (DEP) at the relay into account, we optimize the power distribution between the public and covert messages to achieve the maximum covert rate. We further make a delay-aware comparison among DF, CF and AF relay systems with the obtained closed-form covert rates and conduct an extensive examination on the asymptotic behaviors in different limits. Our analyses reveal that CF or AF tend to outperform DF for high source transmit power or low relay transmit power, while various system parameters such as the processing delay, minimum required quality of service for public messages and DEP threshold lead to different performance relationships among DF, CF and AF for high relay transmit power. Numerical results verify our investigation into the performance comparison in various channel models.

Optimization of Intelligent-Reflecting-Surface-Enabled Covert Communication in Multi-Sensor Systems

“…Addressing security concerns pertaining to information transmission in multi-sensor environments emerges as a pivotal undertaking [3][4][5]. Traditional encryption methodologies and techniques in physical layer security primarily concentrate on protecting the communication content [6,7]. Nevertheless, the mere protection of communication content no longer suffices to meet contemporary information security requisites [8,9].…”

Optimization of Covert Communication in Multi-Sensor Asymmetric Noise Systems

“…Meanwhile, the security issues related to information transmission in the Internet of Things (IoT) will become one of the primary tasks in the future [3][4][5]. Traditional encryption methods and physical layer security techniques aim to prevent eavesdropping on communication content [6,7], but merely protecting communication content is no longer sufficient to meet the current requirements for information security [8]. Even if the information is encrypted, metadata such as network traffic patterns may still leak some sensitive information [9].…”

The Optimization of Covert Communication in Asymmetric Jammer-Assist Systems

“…Secure communication has traditionally centered on preventing adversaries from deciphering message content [1][2][3][4]. However, in the realm of wireless communication, traditional information security measures prove inadequate to meet current security demands [5,6].…”