2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of solid oxide steam electrolysis cells with/without the addition of methane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of the simultaneous cathodic co-electrolysis and the anodic fuel oxidation has been principally examined in the case of methane (Fig. 1a) due to its low cost and abundancy, as well as the possible formation of value-added chemicals from an important greenhouse gas [16][17][18][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] : The Gibbs energy (electrical power demands) and consequently, the reversible potential (E o =ΔGR/nF) of the aforementioned reaction schemes is considerably lower than CO2-H2O coelectrolysis in a conventional electrolyzer (Fig. 1b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concept of the simultaneous cathodic co-electrolysis and the anodic fuel oxidation has been principally examined in the case of methane (Fig. 1a) due to its low cost and abundancy, as well as the possible formation of value-added chemicals from an important greenhouse gas [16][17][18][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] : The Gibbs energy (electrical power demands) and consequently, the reversible potential (E o =ΔGR/nF) of the aforementioned reaction schemes is considerably lower than CO2-H2O coelectrolysis in a conventional electrolyzer (Fig. 1b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By supplying a fuel instead of air over the anode, the electrical energy demands can be reduced, eliminated, or even reversed. , The concept of the simultaneous cathodic co-electrolysis and the anodic fuel oxidation has been principally examined in the case of methane (Figure a) due to low cost and abundancy, as well as the possible formation of value-added chemicals from an important greenhouse gas , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…505,506 As shown in Figure 34, the supplement of methane brought a voltage reduction of almost 1 V and the value of voltage was negative at 0−700 mA•cm −2 , indicating electricity was generated by the SOFEC. 504 Moreover, nearly 90% of the voltage and specific energy demand for hydrogen production was decreased at higher current density of 700−1000 mA•cm −2 . Enhancement of performance was also realized by the bioethanol-assisted water electrolysis, and the effects became more prominent with increasing the ethanol concentration and working temperature.…”
Section: Performance Of Soecsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter portion of the study conducted by Martinez-Frias et al [42], a thermodynamic analysis of a coupled natural gas-assisted SOEC and heat recovery system determined that efficiencies of up to 90% could be attained, based on the total energy supplied to the cell. Computational studies of direct carbon [50] and methane-assisted [51,52] SOECs have also been undertaken to evaluate the effects of various operating conditions and design specifications on cell performance, such as electrode thickness, operating temperature and pressure, inlet molar fraction, and flow velocity. Another study compared the efficiency of carbon monoxide-and methane-assisted electrolyzers to conventional cells, and demonstrated that utilizing either fuel results in greater efficiencies than the latter, with methaneassisted producing the highest values due to the elevated mixtures of hydrogen and carbon monoxide generated by steam reforming [53].…”
Section: Efforts In Fasoecsmentioning
confidence: 99%