2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of TEGs for diverse variable leg geometry with the same leg volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trapezoidal leg geometry provided the highest performance, with a peak e ciency of 5.65% at a surface area of 110 110 mm 2 . Khalil et al, [20] conducted a performance evaluation of 5 thermoelectric leg geometries, just like Ibeagwu [21], under the same volume to nd which geometry provides the best performance. The study was conducted using a numerical model developed in COMSOL Multiphysics and all the computational models were subjected to the same temperature difference of 128 K. The authors reported that for a constant material volume in all the thermoelements, the rectangular-leg thermoelectric generator developed the highest power output and conversion e ciency of 0.11 W and 5.48%, respectively.…”
Section: Variable Area Leg Thermoelectric Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trapezoidal leg geometry provided the highest performance, with a peak e ciency of 5.65% at a surface area of 110 110 mm 2 . Khalil et al, [20] conducted a performance evaluation of 5 thermoelectric leg geometries, just like Ibeagwu [21], under the same volume to nd which geometry provides the best performance. The study was conducted using a numerical model developed in COMSOL Multiphysics and all the computational models were subjected to the same temperature difference of 128 K. The authors reported that for a constant material volume in all the thermoelements, the rectangular-leg thermoelectric generator developed the highest power output and conversion e ciency of 0.11 W and 5.48%, respectively.…”
Section: Variable Area Leg Thermoelectric Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such CTE mismatch will result in large thermal stress, causing drastic breaks when subjected to frequent thermal cycling. Although thermal stress can be reduced somewhat by optimizing the structural factors such as the geometry of TE legs and the thickness of electrodes [ 27 , 28 ], this will increase the processing difficulty and assembly complexity of the module. In this regard, n- and p-type TE pellets with the same geometry are preferred and cuboidal TE legs are commonly used due to the ease of manufacturing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For TEG applications under large temperature gradients, the concerns on the thermomechanical stresses and output performance motivate the efforts to exploit new architectures. [20,21] Various structures beyond the conventional π-shape have been investigated, including the linear design, [22][23][24] angled structure, [25] cylindrical-shaped [26] and tapered structures. [27] Recently, He et al [28] have made an excellent review relative to module architectures.…”
Section: Structural Designmentioning
confidence: 99%