2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-7057-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of three methods for detection of Giardia spp. cysts and Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in drinking-water treatment sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in Brazil utilizing the CCF approach combined with immunomagnetic separation (IMS) have shown slightly improved recovery rates. Giglio and Sabogal-Paz (2018) assessed sludge generated from a water treatment plant and reported an average recovery of 46.1% for Giardia spp. cysts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in Brazil utilizing the CCF approach combined with immunomagnetic separation (IMS) have shown slightly improved recovery rates. Giglio and Sabogal-Paz (2018) assessed sludge generated from a water treatment plant and reported an average recovery of 46.1% for Giardia spp. cysts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that IFA refers to the current protocol established by USEPA methods 1623.1 and 1693 for analysis of water and disinfected wastewater (2012,2014), thus it is assumed to be the first resource WASH practitioners would rely on for periodically monitoring quality considering protozoan parasites. In fact, several studies on environmental samples that do not have a standardised detection method include IFA (Olson et al 1999;Greinert et al 2004;Graczyk et al 2008;Grit et al 2012;Giglio & Sabogal-Paz 2018;Sammarro-Silva & Sabogal-Paz 2020, 2021a, 2021bOgura & Sabogal-Paz 2021. The motive for choosing this protocol is assumed to be its high sensitivity, as older references that consider complex matrices were also immunofluorescencebased, as in Olson et al (1999), which used IFA to quantify the survival of cysts seeded into soil and cattle waste.…”
Section: Immunofluorescence Assay and Dapi Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, studies that focus on the microbiological composition of WTP sludge, as well as its pathogenicity, are extremely necessary, especially related to environmental regulations, since the microbiological characterization of waste from WTPs can encourage new policies related to their management, where the absence of WTS-specific guidelines currently allows reuse of the WTS without any restrictions (Ahmad et al, 2017;Giglio and Sabogal-Paz, 2018;Bernegossi et al, 2022). Several studies address the microbiological diversity present in WTP sludge, showing the importance of microbiological characterization, especially related to close contact with workers, which can represent a risk of infection (Makovcova et al, 2015;Giglio and Sabogal-Paz , 2018;Xu et al, 2018;Ullmann et al, 2019;Ranković et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2021;Bernegossi et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%