Performance comparison of three-phase flux reversal permanent magnet motors in BLDC and BLAC operation mode

The electromagnetic performance calculation and comparison of flux reversal machine with different winding topologies

“…(5) where M rk is the Fourier coefficients, can be expressed as. where A 2k , B 2k , C 2k and D 2k are the integration constants.…”

“…1, and the main difference is the PM poles on one stator tooth. In the traditional configuration, two PMs with opposite polarities are placed at the surface of each stator tooth, and the two PMs at the both sides of the slot opening have the same polarity [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. As proposed in [12], there are four PMs on the stator tooth in the new configuration, and the distributed winding is also proposed to improve the power density.…”

“…The FEM can consider the effect of magnetic saturation, it is well suitable for the analysis of FRM [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Despite its excellent accuracy, the FEM is a time consuming method and it is not suitable for the initial design and optimal design, in which the models with different topologies and dimensions should be analyzed.…”

Nonlinear Performance Characteristics of Flux-Switching PM Motors

“…In the limited amount of publications regarding the performance analysis of the FSPM, the general focus is set on the comparison with machines such as brushless AC/DC and double salient machines [8,9]. In this paper, a detailed overview is given on the nonlinear performance characteristics of the FSPM.…”

“…In this paper, a detailed overview is given on the nonlinear performance characteristics of the FSPM. To generalize the �ndings, the most common topology of the FSPM is chosen, that is, the 3-phase 12/10 with PM excitation, as shown in Figure 1 [4,6,8]. For the performance-characteristic-calculations, a 2D �nite element model (FEM) of the FSPM is created using Flux soware.…”