Proceedings of 2014 11th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences &Amp; Technology (IBCAST) Islamabad, Pakistan, 14 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ibcast.2014.6778172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain beamforming techniques for sensor array processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 a . The imaging results produced by traditional PSBF, traditional SSBF (the frequency‐domain SSBF is adopted here [8, 25]) and the proposed HBF are given in Figs. 4 b–d , respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 a . The imaging results produced by traditional PSBF, traditional SSBF (the frequency‐domain SSBF is adopted here [8, 25]) and the proposed HBF are given in Figs. 4 b–d , respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 in [22]). Unlike PSBF, the shifted‐sideband beamformer (SSBF), based on the complex demodulation and the bandpass sampling, can avoid performance degradation [23–25]. Nevertheless, the implementation of the time delay of SSBF increases the computation load severely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of [3] showed that three beamforming techniques out of seven namely Bartlett, MUSIC, and 2D-FFT provided optimwn performance in comparison to other techniques and 2D-FFT beamforming was selected as the best possible option. This paper further extends the work presented in [3] by applying the three beamforming techniques namely Bartlett, MUSIC, and 2D-FFT to real-time data acquired through a linear sensor arr ay and their detection capability has been evaluated in terms of accurately resolving the incoming targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Authors in [3] presented a performance comparison of different beamforming techniques in terms of their processing requirements and execution times on general purpose processors. The results of [3] showed that three beamforming techniques out of seven namely Bartlett, MUSIC, and 2D-FFT provided optimwn performance in comparison to other techniques and 2D-FFT beamforming was selected as the best possible option.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the shift-invariant point spread function assumption is not valid, the performance of the algorithms is more highly varied. Other investigations have compared the speed of each algorithm, 15 demonstrating that some frequency-domain algorithms can perform at speeds equaling or exceeding the speed of some more traditional time-domain algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%