2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-002-0558-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of two analytical methods for the detection of tissues of the central nervous system in sausages: results of an interlaboratory study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They noted that the GFAP assay was easier to use and to interpret the data than the NSE assay. In a similar study by Agazzi et al [138], the sensitivity of the NSE test kit was reported as being 0.5% (g/g) CNS tissue in raw and medium-heated (80 °C for 20 min) meat samples, rising to 2.0% (g/g) in strongly heated (120 °C for 20 min) meat materials. Another study [146] also found that the NSE immunoreactivity in samples of pure brain and brain muscle dropped signifi-cantly with time at 100 °C, almost disappearing after a 2 h heat treatment.…”
Section: Neuron-specific Enolase (Nse)mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They noted that the GFAP assay was easier to use and to interpret the data than the NSE assay. In a similar study by Agazzi et al [138], the sensitivity of the NSE test kit was reported as being 0.5% (g/g) CNS tissue in raw and medium-heated (80 °C for 20 min) meat samples, rising to 2.0% (g/g) in strongly heated (120 °C for 20 min) meat materials. Another study [146] also found that the NSE immunoreactivity in samples of pure brain and brain muscle dropped signifi-cantly with time at 100 °C, almost disappearing after a 2 h heat treatment.…”
Section: Neuron-specific Enolase (Nse)mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…PCR methods are also prone to contamination. [130][131][132] Immunochemical detection methods based on the specific immunoreactions between an antibody and its target antigen have been extensively employed for the detection of CNS contamination in meat (Table 1), generally in the form of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), [76,128,[133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143] immunoblotting [137][138][139][140][144][145][146][147][148][149] or immunohistochemistry. [145,146,[150][151][152] There are a number of advantages associated with using an immunoassay.…”
Section: Detection Methods For Surveillance Of Prion Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under certain pre-treatment conditions proteins are denatured and antigenicity is decreased or will be lost. In raw or only moderately heated sausages GFAP and NSE were detected at a limit of 0.5% CNS tissue [23]. For strongly heated meat the limit decreased to 2% for NSE but remained constant for GFAP determined with single commercial test kits [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In one study the NSE test was more consistent in detecting the presence of CNS tissues below the 1% level, but the GFAP-ELISA kit was technically easier to use and the data simpler to interpret (Hughson et al, 2003). In two other studies the GFAP test kit was more sensitive, easier, faster to run and less expensive than the NSE kit (Agazzi et al, 2002;Hajmeer et al, 2003). However, it was demonstrated that this commercially available GFAP-ELISA would produce false-positive results in samples with high blood content (Schurr et al, 2004).…”
Section: Of 25mentioning
confidence: 99%