Performance Comparison of VANET Routing Protocols

Rani, Pooja; Sharma, Nitin; Singh, Pariniyojit Kumar

doi:10.1109/wicom.2011.6040428

Cited by 43 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Rani et al [6] used only V2V network topology. While the authors in [7] used a heterogeneous network model, they propose the vehicle node density parameter to improve the performance of the AODV routing protocol and OLSR routing protocol under two different scenarios; however, they do so in the absence of a realistic MAC protocol and fading propagation model for VANETs environment, 802.11g standard was configured and 1440B as a packet payload.…”

Section: Background and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating VANET routing in urban environments

Ali

Phillips

Yang

2016

2016 39th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Background and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating VANET routing in urban environments

Ali

Phillips

Yang

2016

2016 39th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Rani et al [6] used only V2V network topology. While Zuo [7]used a heterogeneous network model, proposing the vehicle node density parameter to improve the performance of the AODV routing protocol and OLSR routing protocol under two different scenarios; however, they do so in the absence of a realistic MAC protocol and fading propagation model for their environment, 802.11g standard was configured and 1440B as a packet payload.…”

Section: Background and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Drop-Burst Length Evaluation of Urban VANETs

Ali¹,

Phillips

Yang³

2017

IJATES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Networks performance is traditionally evaluated using packet delivery ratio (PDR) and latency (delay). We propose an addition mechanism the drop-burst length (DBL). Many traffic classes display varying application-level performance according to the pattern of drops, even if the PDR is similar. In this paper we study a number of VANET scenarios and evaluate them with these three metrics.Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) are an emerging class of Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANETs) where nodes include both moving vehicles and fixed infrastructure. VANETs aim to make transportation systems more intelligent by sharing information to improve safety and comfort. Efficient and adaptive routing protocols are essential for achieving reliable and scalable network performance. However, routing in VANETs is challenging due to the frequent, high-speed movement of vehicles, which results in frequent network topology changes.Our simulations are carried out using NS2 (for network traffic) and SUMO (for vehicular movement) simulators, with scenarios configured to reflect real-world conditions. The results show that OLSR is able to achieve a best DBL performance and demonstrates higher PDR performance comparing to AODV and GPSR under low network load. However, with GPSR, the network shows more stable PDR under medium and high network load. In term of delay OLSR is outperformed by GPSR.

show abstract

“…The proposed system mainly focuses on the issues such as the signal fading and connectivity issues. By reducing the effectiveness of these issues, we can make the VANET as the best mobile ad-hoc network [14] which can effectively make a good transportation system and also can be used for the entertainment purpose. We are going to use the Artificial Bee Colony Optimization algorithm to eliminate the issues that are stated above.…”

Section: A Objective Of the Proposed Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bio-inspired artificial bee colony approach for dynamic independent connectivity patterns in VANET

Baskaran

Basha

Amudhavel³

et al. 2015

2015 International Conference on Circuits, Power and Computing Technologies [ICCPCT-2015]

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network (VANET) [1] which is a sub-type of the mobile ad-hoc networks provides wireless communication between the vehicles and to the Road Side Units (RSU) [2]. In VANET, the communication between the vehicles is used for various purposes like safety, comfort and entertainment.We use the vehicles as the portable nodes to create the mobile network. The VANET uses all the vehicles in the nearby distance as a wireless router or node to form a network. The vehicles can dynamically come in or drop out of the network as they move. The working of the VANET depends on how the routing of data is done in the network. In the recent years, the number of accidents has been increased to a greater count. In order to eradicate this, the implementation of VANET technology is being used in various modes of transportation. Even though VANET has been proposed to be a successful network model, it has some issues to overcome. The most major issues are the connectivity and the signal fading issue. We can overcome some of the issues in VANET by using the Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm (ABC) [3]. The proposed use of the algorithm in VANET may resolve some of the issues effectively.

show abstract

Performance Comparison of VANET Routing Protocols

Cited by 43 publications

References 2 publications

Evaluating VANET routing in urban environments

Evaluating VANET routing in urban environments

Drop-Burst Length Evaluation of Urban VANETs

A bio-inspired artificial bee colony approach for dynamic independent connectivity patterns in VANET

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About