2019
DOI: 10.1051/meca/2019036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of vegetable oil based nanofluids towards machinability improvement in hard turning of HSLA steel using minimum quantity lubrication

Abstract: The search of finding best vegetable oil based nanofluid from a set of three nanoparticle enriched cutting fluids for machining is core objective of the work. Extensive research has been done to replace conventional cutting fluids by nanofluids, but abundant analysis for vegetable oil based nanofluids is accomplished in this work which was not seen earlier. Also, the study investigated the cutting performance and comparative assessment towards machinability improvement during hard turning of high-strength-low-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cutting force (Fc) is considered as one of the main machining response that assess the power and energy consumption during the machining operations. However, many important variables such as the cutting parameters, the machine tool dynamics, characteristic of tool and workpiece material and tribological properties of cutting fluid influence the cutting forces [21,16]. Figure 3 presents the variation of Fc according to cutting speed, feed and different lubricating conditions.…”
Section: Cutting Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cutting force (Fc) is considered as one of the main machining response that assess the power and energy consumption during the machining operations. However, many important variables such as the cutting parameters, the machine tool dynamics, characteristic of tool and workpiece material and tribological properties of cutting fluid influence the cutting forces [21,16]. Figure 3 presents the variation of Fc according to cutting speed, feed and different lubricating conditions.…”
Section: Cutting Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the applications of nanofluids assisted MQL [17,18] and hybrid nanofluids assisted MQL [19] have recently become important research trends in order to enhance the MQL efficiency. Researchers have tried various nano particles with lubricating properties such as Al2O3 (Aluminum Oxide), MoS2 (Molybdenum Disulphide), CuO (Copper oxide), Fe2O3 (Iron oxide) and MWCNT (Multi-walled Carbon Nanotube) [20][21][22]. Das et al [21] carried out the hard turning experiments of HSLA steel using three different nanofluids (AL2O3, CuO, and Fe2O3) and compared the results with regard to the Fc and Ra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cost for the treatment of fluid is higher than purchasing of new cutting fluids in most cases [8]. Thus, to reduce the mass usage of conventional mineral oil cutting fluids and also to minimize their effects on environment and operators, several alternatives are being extremely explored such as solid lubricants, dry machining, cryogenic cooling, minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) [9] technique and also by the application of vegetable oils [10][11][12]. Vegetable based cutting fluids minimizes the health and environmental effects as compared to the petroleum based oils which are biodegradable [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In metal-mechanic processes, using the appropriate type of fluids and lubricants, together with the proper working materials, could reduce the friction and wear of machinery and tooling components. This also increases machine efficiency in terms of workpiece surface finish and tolerances, thus improving machines' operative life and eventually reducing the vibrations and required cutting force [1][2][3][4][5]. According to Oakridge National Laboratory (USA), wear and friction contribute to about 25% of worldwide total energy loss [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%