Performance Comparisons of AOMDV and OLSR Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Network

Oo, May Zin; Othman, Mazliza

doi:10.1109/iccea.2010.33

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The most popular on-demand routing protocol, Adhoc On-demand Multipath Distance Vector (AOMDV) routing protocol [1] is an improvement of Ad-hoc On-demand Routing Protocol (AODV). AOMDV discovers multiple paths between a source and destination to provide efficient fault tolerance by providing quicker and more efficient recovery from route failures in a dynamic network.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Uni Path and Multi Path Routing Protocols in Mobile Adhoc Networks.

Giri¹,

Prithviraj²,

Verma³

2013

IJSSAN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A MANET is an interconnection of mobile devices by wireless links, which forms a dynamic topology. Routing protocols play a vital role in transmission of data across the network. The two major classifications of routing protocols are uni path and multi path. In this paper, we have evaluated the performance of a widely used on-demand uni path routing protocol called AODV and multi path routing protocol AOMDV and MDART . These protocol has been selected due to its edge over other protocols in various aspects, such as reducing delay, routing load etc. The evaluation of all the protocols is carried out in terms of different scenarios using NS2.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Uni Path and Multi Path Routing Protocols in Mobile Adhoc Networks.

Giri¹,

Prithviraj²,

Verma³

2013

IJSSAN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although AOMDV supports multiple paths between a source and destination, it is difficult to recover the packets during the time between the failure of a primary route and the finding of an alternative route. On the other hand, as OLSR nodes always have routes in hand due to its proactive nature, it reduces packet loss rates significantly (Oo & Othman, 2010). Vegas is the best transport variant of TCP, and it is able to provide a lower packet loss rate in most situations.…”

Section: Packet Loss Rate Measurementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some of them like, Kim et al (2005), considered only TCPNewReno and TCP-Vegas depending on AODV and OLSR routing protocols. To the best of our knowledge, very few experimental analyses have been carried out so far (Lim et al, 2003;Oo & Othman, 2010) on the usage of multipath routing protocol. Their experiments are limited to using the ordinary TCP over multipath routing protocols.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Packet Losses and Delay on TCP Traffic over Wireless Ad Hoc Networks

Oo¹,

Othman²

2011

Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks: Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Multipath Dynamic Address Routing (M-DART) is the proactive multipath protocol which is the enhancement of Dynamic Address Routing (DART) protocol and is based on the Distributed hash table (DHT) whose basic function is to spread the location of node throughout the node [7].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

QoS Based Evaluation of Multipath Routing Protocols in Manets

Shakir¹

2017

NET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) are wireless networks formed by several nodes communicating on a peer-to-peer basis without being connected to any fixed infrastructure. These nodes could be laptop computers, personal digital assistants, mobile phones or sensors dispersed in an area to measure certain data and send the information to a larger node. Where a source node and a destination node are not within direct range, they communicate through multi-hop routing, i.e. nodes in between them relay messages between source and destination. The routing protocol plays a key role in finding and maintaining the route in MANETs. Routing protocol can be a uni-path and multi-path. A multipath routing protocol is designed to increase the reliability in MANET. This research work focuses on Quality of Service (QoS) based evolution of multipath routing protocol. For this purpose, diverse type of simulation scenarios is designed to find the impact of mobility, increasing the number of nodes and pause time in MANETs. The results revealed that multipath routing protocol has comparatively less delay (percentage decrease of 81.52%). While unipath routing protocols have less packet drop ratio (percentage decrease of 47.78%) and routing overhead (percentage decrease of 99.30%).

show abstract

Performance Comparisons of AOMDV and OLSR Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Network

Cited by 8 publications

References 8 publications

Analysis of Uni Path and Multi Path Routing Protocols in Mobile Adhoc Networks.

Analysis of Uni Path and Multi Path Routing Protocols in Mobile Adhoc Networks.

The Effect of Packet Losses and Delay on TCP Traffic over Wireless Ad Hoc Networks

QoS Based Evaluation of Multipath Routing Protocols in Manets

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About