2016 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iccnc.2016.7440668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance considerations of network functions virtualization using containers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Because AF_GRAFT is an enhancement on the socket layer, applications that are sensitive to networks do not work with AF_GRAFT. For example, AF_GRAFT cannot be applied to container-based Network Function Virtualization (NFV) [12,20,37]. In container-based NFV, virtual network functions packaged in containers process and deliver packets using low-level packet I/O mechanisms such as virtual interfaces or high-speed packet I/O.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because AF_GRAFT is an enhancement on the socket layer, applications that are sensitive to networks do not work with AF_GRAFT. For example, AF_GRAFT cannot be applied to container-based Network Function Virtualization (NFV) [12,20,37]. In container-based NFV, virtual network functions packaged in containers process and deliver packets using low-level packet I/O mechanisms such as virtual interfaces or high-speed packet I/O.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Container‐based virtualization is an alternative to hypervisors where the virtualization layer runs as an application of the local operating system level . Since applications in containers run directly on the operating system and do not use hardware indirections, they should be more efficient than their VM‐based counterparts and allow higher application density on the same host . The comparison is made between a traditional VM running on the Virtualbox hypervisor and a container running on the Docker platform.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of their latest documents, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) describes the deployment of VNFs using containers . Containers are a relatively new technology that allow the execution applications as sandboxed instances on the host machine . Container‐based virtualization is a potential alternative to hypervisors because they can share the same kernel of the host system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cziva and Pezaros [7] also propose a concrete application of GLANF to the network edge, exploiting lightweight container-based network functions that can run on a variety of edge devices. Anderson et al [8] investigate performance of container-based network functions, addressing Docker as a promising technology to enhance efficiency and deployment time of NFV environments. The authors also stress the potential of Docker in terms of packaging specification, as a means to standardise the vNSF format and to ease its distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%