2019
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2019.2925849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance-Cost Tradeoff of Using Mobile Roadside Units for V2X Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As future work, we plan to adopt machine learning techniques to enable each vehicle to predict its neighbors' decision and find the optimal resource selection policy such as a recent study leveraging a deep learning tool for vehicular communications [52]. We will also investigate utilizing roadside units [53] for resource scheduling of V2V messages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As future work, we plan to adopt machine learning techniques to enable each vehicle to predict its neighbors' decision and find the optimal resource selection policy such as a recent study leveraging a deep learning tool for vehicular communications [52]. We will also investigate utilizing roadside units [53] for resource scheduling of V2V messages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D is the direction of the node, A is the availability of the node, and R is the range of the radio. Then the network priority (P N W ) could be calculated from (16).…”
Section: Ranking Of Data Nodes and Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different standardizations have already addressed the safety-critical applications of the V2X by using redundant and multiple communication channels and low delay technologies [10]- [12]. The available solutions have cost and timing challenges to address as well [13]- [16]. Currently, V2X rely on multi-technology and multi-network capabilities in disseminating and collecting information among the vehicles [17]- [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every vehicle has a communication coverage of 100 m and uses the 802.11p (WAVE) [ 49 ] protocol as the MAC protocol with a header size of 70 bytes. For the propagation delay and the propagation loss models [ 50 ], our simulations use the Constant Speed Propagation Delay Model [ 51 , 52 ] and the Nakagami Propagation Loss Model [ 53 , 54 ], respectively. We set the size of the requested content from 150 to 400 (MB).…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%