Performance criteria in preclinical denture prosthodontics

Razzoog, Michael E.; Shotwell, Jeffrey L.; Lang, Brien R.

doi:10.1016/0022-3913(78)90097-5

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Much has been written about establishing criteria for grading specific clinical tasks (e.g. each step in a class II restoration) and methods for inter‐ and intra‐instructor calibration (1–5). These methods do serve a definite need in the assessment of clinical competence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The flexible requirement system for grading of clinical performance of undergraduate dental students

elBadrawy

Korayem

2007

Eur J Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A new grading system is presented for evaluating and grading dental students' clinical competence and performance in paediatric dentistry at the undergraduate level. The Flexible Requirements System is a clinical competence evaluation system designed to address some of the common deficiencies of other requirements-based performance evaluation systems, by utilising a unique method of collecting and manipulating certain measurements of student performance in various groups of clinical procedures. The system aimed to incorporate adequate flexibility in its requirements to afford students fair and equal opportunities, whilst maintaining adherence to departmental clinical competence criteria and standards.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The flexible requirement system for grading of clinical performance of undergraduate dental students

elBadrawy

Korayem

2007

Eur J Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Systematic Review of the Use of Self‐Assessment in Preclinical and Clinical Dental Education

Mays

Branch-Mays

2016

Journal of Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A desired outcome of dental and dental hygiene programs is the development of students' self-assessment skills. To that end, the Commission on Dental Accreditation states that "graduates must demonstrate the ability to self-assess." However, it is unclear that merely providing opportunity for self-assessment actually leads to the desired outcome. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on self-assessment in dental education. A search of English-language articles for the past 25 years (January 1, 1990, to June 30, 2015 was performed using MEDLINE Medical Subject Heading terms. Each abstract and/ or article was validated for inclusion. The data collected included student classification, self-assessment environment, faculty assessment, training, faculty calibration, predictive value, and student perceptions. A qualitative analysis was also performed. From an initial list of 258 articles, 19 were selected for inclusion; exclusion criteria included studies that evaluated a non-preclinical or non-clinical exercise or whose subjects were not predoctoral dental or dental hygiene students. The results showed limited information regarding any kind of systematic training of students on how to perform a self-assessment. The majority of the studies also did not specify the impact of self-assessment on student performance. Self-assessment was primarily performed in the second year and in the preclinical environment. Students received feedback through a correlated faculty assessment in 73% of the studies, but 64% did not provide information regarding students' perceptions of self-assessment. There was a trend for students to be better self-assessors in studies in which a grade was connected to the process. In addition, there was a trend for better performing students to underrate themselves and for poorer performing students to overrate themselves and, overall, for students to score themselves higher than did their faculty evaluators. These findings suggest the need for greater attention to systematically teaching self-assessment in dental and dental hygiene curricula and for further research on the impact of self-assessment on desired outcomes.

show abstract

Review of the literature

Graser¹

1990

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Performance criteria in preclinical denture prosthodontics

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

The flexible requirement system for grading of clinical performance of undergraduate dental students

The flexible requirement system for grading of clinical performance of undergraduate dental students

A Systematic Review of the Use of Self‐Assessment in Preclinical and Clinical Dental Education

Review of the literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About