2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance deterioration of corroded RC beams and reinforcing bars under repeated loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the loss of flexural strength of test specimens subjected to fatigue and corrosion was almost twice the loss of flexural strength of those subjected to corrosion only (CHEN; ZHENG; WAND, 2009). Further research carried out later observed that the increase in the degree of corrosion of the reinforcement decreased the fatigue strength of reinforced concrete beams, causing them to fracture fragile (YI et al, 2010;SUN;HUANG;REN, 2015). These studies found that beams with noncorroded reinforcements withstood more than 2,000,000 cycles of fatigue, in other words, the fatigue test did not significantly influence the performance of the studied beams.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In general, the loss of flexural strength of test specimens subjected to fatigue and corrosion was almost twice the loss of flexural strength of those subjected to corrosion only (CHEN; ZHENG; WAND, 2009). Further research carried out later observed that the increase in the degree of corrosion of the reinforcement decreased the fatigue strength of reinforced concrete beams, causing them to fracture fragile (YI et al, 2010;SUN;HUANG;REN, 2015). These studies found that beams with noncorroded reinforcements withstood more than 2,000,000 cycles of fatigue, in other words, the fatigue test did not significantly influence the performance of the studied beams.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The reason can be concluded that the performance deterioration of the specimens supplies a specific stress state variation for the rebar at the bottom in this work which is different from that in literature [10,22], due to the different processes of material degradation (e.g., the concrete degradation caused by fatigue cracks [10,[23][24][25][26], the prestressed strand degradation resulted from fatigue plasticity [27]), specimen stiffness degradation and curvature variation [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and so forth. Thirdly, the corrosion of the rebar generally results in an obvious reduction of specimen fatigue life [4,6,8,21]. It causes an obviously lower fatigue life predicted by the model [21] compared with that by the other models (Figure 8(c)); therefore, the corrosion of rebar influences the fatigue life of the bridge.…”
Section: S-n Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In detail, Figure 8 and (2) show that the bridge subjected to the train loading with a 30-ton axle weight (i.e., Δσ r ≈ 120 MPa) satisfies the fatigue life requirement of the Chinese standard [20] (i.e., N f ≈ 10 6.57 ≈ 3.7 × 10 6 > 2.0 × 10 6 ). However, considering the environmental effects, such as the corrosion of rebar/prestressed strand, especially taking into account the negative effects of the low quality of concrete casting, and so forth, the coupling of train loads and environmental effects generally highly reduces the fatigue life of the bridge compared with that only of train loading [4,6,8,21] (see Figure 8(c)). …”
Section: Performance Deterioration Of Heavy-haul Railwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations