Performance differences between instructions on paper vs digital glasses for a simple assembly task

Rodriguez, Francisca S.; Saleem, Khadija; Spilski, Jan; Lachmann, Thomas

doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103423

Cited by 19 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Wang et al (2019) state that several users noticed visual fatigue after performing maintenance activities wearing Google Glasses. Rodriguez et al (2021) show that it took time for users' eyes to adapt to smart glasses, that they were uncomfortable, and that operators experienced headaches after wearing them for a while.…”

Section: Developing Alternative Assumptions -Slr Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The “dark side” of Industry 4.0: How can technology be made more sustainable?

Dieste

Orzes

Culot

et al. 2023

IJOPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeA positive outlook on the impact of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) on sustainability prevails in the literature. However, some studies have highlighted potential areas of concern that have not yet been systematically addressed. The goal of this study is to challenge the assumption of a sustainable Fourth Industrial Revolution by (1) identifying the possible unintended negative impacts of I4.0 technologies on sustainability; (2) highlighting the underlying motivations and potential actions to mitigate such impacts; and (3) developing and evaluating alternative assumptions on the impacts of I4.0 technologies on sustainability.Design/methodology/approachBuilding on a problematization approach, a systematic literature review was conducted to develop potential alternative assumptions about the negative impacts of I4.0 on sustainability. Then, a Delphi study was carried out with 43 experts from academia and practice to evaluate the alternative assumptions. Two rounds of data collection were performed until reaching the convergence or stability of the responses.FindingsThe results highlight various unintended negative effects on environmental and social aspects that challenge the literature. The reasons behind the high/low probability of occurrence, the severity of each impact in the next five years and corrective actions are also identified. Unintended negative environmental effects are less controversial than social effects and are therefore more likely to generate widely accepted theoretical propositions. Finally, the alternative hypothesis ground is partially accepted by the panel, indicating that the problematization process has effectively opened up new perspectives for analysis.Originality/valueThis study is one of the few to systematically problematize the assumptions of the I4.0 and sustainability literature, generating research propositions that reveal several avenues for future research.

show abstract

Section: Developing Alternative Assumptions -Slr Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The “dark side” of Industry 4.0: How can technology be made more sustainable?

Dieste

Orzes

Culot

et al. 2023

IJOPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This study also reported that the manual method was preferred by the users because monocular HMDs caused slight discomfort during the experiment. Similarly, Rodriguez et al (2021) also found that the use of OST‐HMDs had a poor satisfaction compared with the traditional method. The reasons were that people were more accustomed to traditional method, and the participants had difficulty to adjust visual angle and field of view when using OST‐HMDs (Rodriguez et al, 2021; Wang et al, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…Similarly, Rodriguez et al (2021) also found that the use of OST‐HMDs had a poor satisfaction compared with the traditional method. The reasons were that people were more accustomed to traditional method, and the participants had difficulty to adjust visual angle and field of view when using OST‐HMDs (Rodriguez et al, 2021; Wang et al, 2019). Compared with monitor‐based AR applications, visual fatigue may influence human performance through the continuous use of head‐mounted AR applications (Odenthal et al, 2014; Pfendler & Schlick, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Usability evaluation of augmented reality‐based maintenance instruction system

Wang

2021

Hum Ftrs & Erg Mfg Svc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents an augmented reality-based instruction (ARBI) system for maintenance tasks. A traditional manual instruction method and a computer-assisted instruction method were compared. Three maintenance instruction methods, three task difficulty levels (low, medium, and high), and the user's gender (male and female) were specified as the independent variables in the experimental design. The dependent variables included task completion time and error rate as objective measures, and system usability scale (SUS) and NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX) scores as subjective measures. There were 30 participants (15 males and 15 females) in the experiment. The results indicated that the instruction method and task difficulty significantly affected the task completion time, error rate, SUS, and NASA-TLX.Among the instruction methods, the ARBI method exhibited the highest SUS score, lowest NASA-TLX score, shortest task completion time, and minimum error rate. In conclusion, the proposed ARBI method was beneficial for assisting iPhone maintenance tasks.

show abstract

“…Note that during data coding, this scale was converted to a range from −3 to +3. The 26 items are organized into 6 groups, briefly summarized as follows: Attractiveness (e.g., Do users like or dislike the product); Stimulation (e.g., Is it exciting and motivating to use the product); Novelty (e.g., Is the product innovative and creative); Perspicuity (e.g., Is it easy to learn how to use the product); Efficiency (e.g., Can users solve their tasks without unnecessary effort); Dependability (e.g., Does the user feel in control of the interaction [51]. Attractiveness is assessed on valence.…”

Section: Data Collection Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Occupant-Centric Digital Twin: A Case Study on Occupant Engagement in Thermal Comfort Decision-Making

Saadatifar,

Sawyer,

Byrne

2024

Architecture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In open and shared workplaces, like co-working spaces or educational studios, thermal preferences vary widely among occupants. With the rise of flexible organizational workplace strategies, the challenge lies in balancing optimum, efficient temperature setpoints with maintaining occupants’ comfort. A potential solution involves a deeper understanding of variations in indoor climate and building occupants’ decision-making and preferences. This paper explores how an Occupant-Centric Digital Twin (OCDT) might address this by mapping indoor microclimates through a grid of IoT temperature sensors in real time. A large-screen display is utilized to present and visualize these data in an open workplace. The goal is to enhance awareness and provide agency for occupants to identify zones that align with their individual thermal preferences. A mixed-method occupant study (N = 27) was conducted to validate the approach. Exposure to the OCDT display resulted in higher thermal satisfaction among participants (p-value = 1.269 × 10−5, 0.05 significance level). The novelty of OCDT lies in extending the use of digital twin technology from facility managers to occupants, by granting them the agency to address comfort issues even in buildings where they lack direct control over the thermostat. This approach paves the way for a future where occupants in open workspaces can make informed decisions about where to work and how to achieve thermal comfort in those choices.

show abstract

Performance differences between instructions on paper vs digital glasses for a simple assembly task

Cited by 19 publications

References 31 publications

The “dark side” of Industry 4.0: How can technology be made more sustainable?

The “dark side” of Industry 4.0: How can technology be made more sustainable?

Usability evaluation of augmented reality‐based maintenance instruction system

Occupant-Centric Digital Twin: A Case Study on Occupant Engagement in Thermal Comfort Decision-Making

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About