Proceedings. Fifth International Conference on High Performance Computing (Cat. No. 98EX238)
DOI: 10.1109/hipc.1998.738016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance-driven design and redesign of high-speed local area networks

Abstract: Although distributed computing over a network of computers has become a reality, its success mainly depends on the performance of the underlying network. In this paper, we consider the problem of designing a local area network with specified cost and performance constraints. The cost and performance of a local area network (LAN) are directly related to its topology. Using the a priori knowledge of the approximate number of users of the network and the kind of communication traffic that must be supported, the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The redesigned network in Figure 9 is comprised of the following switches SW-3, SW-4, SW-5, SW-6, SW-7, SW-8, SW-9, SW-10 and SW-11, which are operational with the maximum of 12, 24, 32, 32, 12, 32, 48, 32 and 48 ports, respectively. However, in the redesigned network, these switches utilize 6,16,29,27,3,27,41,21 and 39 ports to connect the network devices, respectively. With this, the maximum scalabilities of the switches are 50%, 33%, 9%, 16%, 75%, 16%, 15%, 34% and 19% in the same order.…”
Section: Assessing the Redesigned Network For Its Capacity To Future mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The redesigned network in Figure 9 is comprised of the following switches SW-3, SW-4, SW-5, SW-6, SW-7, SW-8, SW-9, SW-10 and SW-11, which are operational with the maximum of 12, 24, 32, 32, 12, 32, 48, 32 and 48 ports, respectively. However, in the redesigned network, these switches utilize 6,16,29,27,3,27,41,21 and 39 ports to connect the network devices, respectively. With this, the maximum scalabilities of the switches are 50%, 33%, 9%, 16%, 75%, 16%, 15%, 34% and 19% in the same order.…”
Section: Assessing the Redesigned Network For Its Capacity To Future mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, literatures [19,20] described a heuristic algorithm for self-configuring topology, whereby the algorithms maintained the spanning tree by changing the topology through additions and deletions of network devices. The authors in [21][22][23] formulated the network redesign problem as an optimization problem. Ravikumar et al [21] extended the topological design problem in [22] by considering network reliability constraints using genetic algorithm; Habib [23] explored the use of computer-aided design technique for redesigning network topology with technology consideration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An early effort by Ravikumar, Pandit, and Mishra [4] describes applying a number of classical techniques, such as the KernighanLin (KL) algorithm for partitioning and the Steiner tree for routing, for the LAN redesign problem. The KL algorithm was used to find the best possible location to add/move clients between the segments of a LAN; A Steiner tree was used to connect clients within the segment, obtaining a minimal cable cost.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%