“…Scholars thus proposed the associations between internationalization and firm performance to be positively or negatively linear (Grant, 1987;Kim and Lyn, 1987;Michel and Shaked, 1986;Dikova et al, 2016), U shaped (Qian, 1997;Ruigrok and Wagner, 2003;Capar and Kotabe, 2003;Thomas, 2006), inverted U shaped (Hitt et al, 1997;Gomes and Ramaswamy, 1999;Jung, 2007), and even S shaped three-phases curvilinear (Lu and Beamish, 2004;Contractor et al, 2002). Although the findings of the above studies hold significant implication for internationalization and performance research (Asmussen, 2009;Geringer et al, 2000;Wan and Hoskisson, 2003), some researchers argue that the mixed and inconsistent results are due to ignoring the critical regional dimensions of multinationality (Rugman and Verbeke, 2004;Ral-Trebacz and Eckert, 2016). A region can be defined as an area in which the culture, consumer needs, living standard and economic development are similar (Berry, 2004).…”