2004
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2002.003103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance enhanced headgear: a scientific approach to the development of protective headgear

Abstract: Background: There is a continuing debate about the performance of protective headgear in rugby union, rugby league, and Australian rules football. Objectives: To examine the impact energy attenuation performance of foam that could be incorporated into headgear and examine the performance of prototypes of modified headgear. Methods: Impact tests were conducted on polyethylene foams and protective headgear. Free fall drop tests with a rigid headform on to a flat rigid anvil were conducted. Resultant headform acc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research into protective equipment in rugby has mainly focused on the influence of headgear, shin guards and mouth guards in reducing injury (Wilson, 1998;McIntosh, McCrory & Finch, 2004;Marshall, Loomis, Waller, Chalmers, Bird, Quarrie et al, 2004). The introduction of shoulder pads was meant to decrease the incidence of shoulder injury during front-on rugby tackles, but its performance has not been quantitatively assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research into protective equipment in rugby has mainly focused on the influence of headgear, shin guards and mouth guards in reducing injury (Wilson, 1998;McIntosh, McCrory & Finch, 2004;Marshall, Loomis, Waller, Chalmers, Bird, Quarrie et al, 2004). The introduction of shoulder pads was meant to decrease the incidence of shoulder injury during front-on rugby tackles, but its performance has not been quantitatively assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-to-peak force was most effectively reduced by the Protector headgear. In a biomechanical analysis, McIntosh et al(89) demonstrated considerable improvement in impact energy attenuation with only minor design changes in headgear, although current designs of headgear for soccer did not reduce the probability of concussion…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The modified headgear group used a thicker polyethylene foam (16 mm thickness, 60 kg/m 3 compared with the standard: 10 mm thickness, 45 kg/m 3 ) that was shown to have superior attenuation of impact energy [110]. No significant differences were found in concussion rates, and the authors attributed this lack of difference due to the low compliance of headgear use in the groups.…”
Section: Rugbymentioning
confidence: 85%