2022
DOI: 10.3390/computation10030043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Enhancement of APW+lo Calculations by Simplest Separation of Concerns

Abstract: Full-potential linearized augmented plane wave (LAPW) and APW plus local orbital (APW+lo) codes differ widely in both their user interfaces and in capabilities for calculations and analysis beyond their common central task of all-electron solution of the Kohn–Sham equations. However, that common central task opens a possible route to performance enhancement, namely to offload the basic LAPW/APW+lo algorithms to a library optimized purely for that purpose. To explore that opportunity, we have interfaced the Exc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That removes all-electron calculations from the picture. (There is KSDFT software for the all-electron linearized augmented plane wave basis (LAPW). , However, that basis is atom-centered and muffin-tin-based and, hence, quite ill-suited to AIMD.) An excellent compromise for the PW basis is provided by the PAW method. , In conventional KSDFT calculations, PAWs seem largely to have supplanted NLPPs.…”
Section: Ofdft In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…That removes all-electron calculations from the picture. (There is KSDFT software for the all-electron linearized augmented plane wave basis (LAPW). , However, that basis is atom-centered and muffin-tin-based and, hence, quite ill-suited to AIMD.) An excellent compromise for the PW basis is provided by the PAW method. , In conventional KSDFT calculations, PAWs seem largely to have supplanted NLPPs.…”
Section: Ofdft In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can notice the large panel of scientific topics covered by Karlheinz's knowledge. We deeply acknowledge the following contributions related to spectroscopy by Manuel Yañez et al [12], Juan-Carlos Sancho-García and Emilio San-Fabián [13]; excited states by Ágnes Nagy [14], Kalidas Sen et al [15] and Fabrizia Negri et al [16]; DFT developments by Fabio Della Sala et al [17], Mathias Rapacioli and Nathalie Tarrat [18], Emmanuel Fromager et al [19], José Manuel García de la Vega et al [20] and Harry Ramanantoanina [21]; results analysis by Andreas Savin et al [22] and Manuel Richter et al [23]; and, of course, the solid state and surfaces by Leila Kalantari and Fabien Tran et al [24], Denis Salahub et al [25], Peter Blaha et al [26], Samuel B. Trickey [27], William Lafargue-Dit-Hauret and Xavier Rocquefelte [28], Tzonka Mineva and Hazar Guesmi et al [29]. (H.C.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%