2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance enhancement of α-Fe2O3@Bi2S3 heterojunction for photocathodic protection of 304SS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was worth noting that the CoPi/Mg–Fe 2 O 3 had the strongest absorption capacity for photons of the same wavelength, followed by Mg–Fe 2 O 3 and α-Fe 2 O 3 . Their band-gap energies were calculated by plotting the Tauc plots according to eq . ( α h v ) 1 / n = A false( h v E normalg false) where α is the absorption coefficient, hv is the incident photon energy, A is a constant, and the value of n is taken as 2 for α-Fe 2 O 3 with indirect band-gap . As shown in Figure S6b, the band-gap energies were 2.10, 2.08, and 2.07 eV for α-Fe 2 O 3 , Mg–Fe 2 O 3 , and CoPi/Mg–Fe 2 O 3 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was worth noting that the CoPi/Mg–Fe 2 O 3 had the strongest absorption capacity for photons of the same wavelength, followed by Mg–Fe 2 O 3 and α-Fe 2 O 3 . Their band-gap energies were calculated by plotting the Tauc plots according to eq . ( α h v ) 1 / n = A false( h v E normalg false) where α is the absorption coefficient, hv is the incident photon energy, A is a constant, and the value of n is taken as 2 for α-Fe 2 O 3 with indirect band-gap . As shown in Figure S6b, the band-gap energies were 2.10, 2.08, and 2.07 eV for α-Fe 2 O 3 , Mg–Fe 2 O 3 , and CoPi/Mg–Fe 2 O 3 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where α is the absorption coefficient, hv is the incident photon energy, A is a constant, and the value of n is taken as 2 for α-Fe 2 O 3 with indirect band-gap. 37 As shown in Figure S6b, the band-gap energies were 2.10, 2.08, and 2.07 eV for α-Fe 38,39 The linear portion of the depletion layer in the M-S curve was fitted to a straight line, and then the donor concentration (N d ) and flat-band potential (V fb ) of the photoanodes were obtained from the slope and intercept of the straight line by eq 8.…”
Section: Kinetic Characterization Of Charge Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%