2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation and comparison of commonly used optimization algorithms for natural gas liquefaction processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thanks to the maturity of the algorithm, multiple open-source NSGA2 implementation tools are available, and researchers and engineers can easily apply the algorithm to their own problems. At the same time, some aspects of its performance, such as computational efficiency and convergence, still have certain advantages compared to other algorithms [25][26][27]. In this study, we use the NSGA2 algorithm to coordinate the calculation of the relationship between the three objective functions.…”
Section: Response Surface Methods and Nsga2 Multi-objective Optimizat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the maturity of the algorithm, multiple open-source NSGA2 implementation tools are available, and researchers and engineers can easily apply the algorithm to their own problems. At the same time, some aspects of its performance, such as computational efficiency and convergence, still have certain advantages compared to other algorithms [25][26][27]. In this study, we use the NSGA2 algorithm to coordinate the calculation of the relationship between the three objective functions.…”
Section: Response Surface Methods and Nsga2 Multi-objective Optimizat...mentioning
confidence: 99%