2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation and Life Prediction of Highway Concrete Bridge Superstructure across Design Types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Madanat et al [44], Moomen et al [14], and Saeed et al [53] have developed different deterioration models for Indiana. The common factors found in the three studies were the following: age, ADT, state or non-state type of bridges, freeze and thaw cycles, number of spans, bridge length, skewness, and type of services under the bridge.…”
Section: Factors Considered In North Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Madanat et al [44], Moomen et al [14], and Saeed et al [53] have developed different deterioration models for Indiana. The common factors found in the three studies were the following: age, ADT, state or non-state type of bridges, freeze and thaw cycles, number of spans, bridge length, skewness, and type of services under the bridge.…”
Section: Factors Considered In North Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers conducted time-dependent reliability analysis for evaluating existing or rehabilitated bridges [154][155][156][157][158][159][160]. For example, using MC simulation, Zhu et al [154] presented a probabilistic method for evaluating time-dependent reliability of reinforced-concrete bridge components to predict residual capacity after subsequent rehabilitation.…”
Section: Bridge Design and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Empirical modelling approaches (Agrawal and Kawaguchi 2009;Lavrenz et al 2015;Moomen et al 2016;Saeed et al 2017a;Saeed et al 2017b;Tolliver and Pan 2011;Van Noortwijk and Klatter 2004;Veshosky et al 1994;Zhang et al 2003) • Discrete choice models (Saeed et al 2016;Saeed et al 2017c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%