2020
DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2020.1842679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation and yield stability of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties in Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest yield was obtained for the genotype Patobi; but because of sample size direct comparison of Patobi and other scarcely occurring landraces with those of frequently occurring landraces could not be made. Our results are in agreement with Zewdu et al [34] who observed a wide variability in grain yield of upland rice which they attributed to differences in the test locations in Ethiopia and genotypic variations. Earlier, Van Keer et al [35] also reported extensive variability in productivity of tropical japonica type glutinous upland rice varieties in an extensive research area in northern Thailand.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The highest yield was obtained for the genotype Patobi; but because of sample size direct comparison of Patobi and other scarcely occurring landraces with those of frequently occurring landraces could not be made. Our results are in agreement with Zewdu et al [34] who observed a wide variability in grain yield of upland rice which they attributed to differences in the test locations in Ethiopia and genotypic variations. Earlier, Van Keer et al [35] also reported extensive variability in productivity of tropical japonica type glutinous upland rice varieties in an extensive research area in northern Thailand.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Both linear and non-linear components of G x E interaction were found to be significant for all studied traits as indicated by highly significant mean squares due to G x E (linear) interaction and pooled deviation. The obtained results are in agreement with those obtained by (Kumar et al, 2012) and (Zewdu et al, 2020). The grain yield of rice cultivars differed considerably with the change in environmental conditions including locations and years.…”
Section: Analysis Of Variancesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…While, Giza182 and Egyptain Yasmin gave values lower than 1 of bi indicating that these genotypes suitable for poor environments. Sakha105 ,Giza177 and Sakha102 exhibited bi higher than 1 it means that it's suitable for favorable environments while its performance will poor in unfavorable environments (Ravindra et al, 2012;Girma, 2018 andZewdu et al, 2020). Thus, these rice cultivars can be valuable for severe environments studies which the identified varieties are recommended for their appropriateness under poor environmental conditions as shown in Table 6.…”
Section: Stability Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The genotype×environment interactions were partitioned into six significant interaction PCAs and 61.8% variance was explained by first two IPCAs together (Table 6). Similarly Zewdu et al (2020) partitioned the genotype×environment interactions into six rays which divided the biplot into seven sections. GGE bi-plot genotype view depicts that the hybrid JGLH 365 (G15) and US 314 (G8) were inside the first concentric circle and found to be more stable across environments (Figure 2).…”
Section: Gge Bi-plot Model Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%