2021
DOI: 10.3390/architecture1020011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation: Identifying Barriers and Enablers for Landscape Architecture Practice

Abstract: Performance evaluation is crucial for environmental design and sustainable development, especially so for architecture and landscape architecture. However, such performance evaluations remain rare in practice. It is argued that the concerns over potential negative evaluations and a lack of funding are the two main barriers preventing the undertaking of performance evaluations. This research investigated how these two barriers were overcome in practice by studying 41 evaluation cases in the New Zealand landscap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As this study is primarily concerned with the level of knowledge abstraction in practice, landscape architecture practitioners are the best sources of information. Therefore, members of the American Society of Landscape Architecture (ASLA), the largest professional association for landscape architecture in North America (15,155 members), were chosen for this study [38]. In order to keep the survey more manageable, this study only randomly sampled a small portion, about 5%, of the selected population, who were all full and honorary members with valid email addresses listed in the ASLA online member directory.…”
Section: Data Collection and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this study is primarily concerned with the level of knowledge abstraction in practice, landscape architecture practitioners are the best sources of information. Therefore, members of the American Society of Landscape Architecture (ASLA), the largest professional association for landscape architecture in North America (15,155 members), were chosen for this study [38]. In order to keep the survey more manageable, this study only randomly sampled a small portion, about 5%, of the selected population, who were all full and honorary members with valid email addresses listed in the ASLA online member directory.…”
Section: Data Collection and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of evaluation is always carried out after the built work has been occupied or been in service to allow the users to fully experience the design and for potential problems to become apparent [3]. As argued by numerous scholars and practitioners [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], evaluating the actual performance of implemented designs is considered highly important for the healthy growth of the environmental design discipline and to help the relevant professions to better understand how their design solutions work in reality and, therefore, contribute to a better-performing built environment. There is a considerable number of studies published around POE since the late 1960s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LAF study analysed the methodology documents of the 148 CSI cases and developed a guidebook, in which a wide range of performance indicators and evaluation methods were documented to help future evaluators plan and conduct their evaluations. The CSI initiative is the most influential research programme in the field of landscape performance evaluation and was a representative example of one of the two most viable evaluation mechanisms identified by Chen et al [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported by Chen, Bowring, and Davis [30], apart from the evaluation cases that were undertaken under the CSI's benefits-oriented evaluation mechanism, there are also a wide range of cases that were evaluated under a different mechanism, adopting a financially and institutionally independent approach. However, there is no similar study mapping the methodological terrain of the cases conducted beyond the CSI mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation