2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of 10-year ultrasound image-based stroke/cardiovascular (CV) risk calculator by comparing against ten conventional CV risk calculators: A diabetic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that the AtheroRisk-Integrated ML system is efficient, accurate, and affordable. Risk stratification performed using EEGS is the first step to prevent higher costs and simplicity in design (4,11,12,29,41). Although the proposed study has clearly met the pre-defined hypothesis, more modifications can be possible to improve the CV/ stroke risk assessment such as conducting a multicenter study.…”
Section: Study Limitations and Future Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We believe that the AtheroRisk-Integrated ML system is efficient, accurate, and affordable. Risk stratification performed using EEGS is the first step to prevent higher costs and simplicity in design (4,11,12,29,41). Although the proposed study has clearly met the pre-defined hypothesis, more modifications can be possible to improve the CV/ stroke risk assessment such as conducting a multicenter study.…”
Section: Study Limitations and Future Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two operators (with 15 years of experience) analyzed the scans. We used the CUS image acquisition protocol presented before (11,12,21,22). The analytical approach and study design for this manuscript are unique with respect to previously published reports using this cohort (11,12,21,22).…”
Section: Study Population and Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies have combined the effect of these image-based phenotypes with conventional risk factors, including pro-inflammatory markers like erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), to perform CVD risk assessment [42][43][44]. Such integrated risk calculators have demonstrated better CVD risk stratification when compared to traditional CVD risk calculators in non-RA patients [42,43,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 9 The primary reason for this poor performance is the dependence of such models on the cardiovascular risk factors (CRF) that does not provide complete information about cardiovascular health of patients. 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%