Geo-Congress 2013 2013
DOI: 10.1061/9780784412787.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of a Slope Reinforced with Recycled Plastic Pin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The liquid limits (LL) and plasticity indices (PI) of the samples ranged between 48 to 79 and 25 to 51, respectively. Besides, an increase in moisture below 1.5 m was observed, which ranged up to 6 m. The details of the study are summarized by Khan et al (7).…”
Section: Project Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The liquid limits (LL) and plasticity indices (PI) of the samples ranged between 48 to 79 and 25 to 51, respectively. Besides, an increase in moisture below 1.5 m was observed, which ranged up to 6 m. The details of the study are summarized by Khan et al (7).…”
Section: Project Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the conventional techniques for the repair of shallow slope failures are often deemed too expensive. Recycled plastic pins (RPPs) have been used in Texas, Missouri, and Iowa as a more cost-effective solution for slope stabilization than conventional techniques (5)(6)(7)(8). RPPs driven into the slope face provide an additional resistance along the slip plane that restricts the progression of the slip surface and increases the factor of safety.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crawler mounted rig with pseudo-vibratory hammer system works effectively for installation of RPP Khan et al, 2013). During the current study, the similar installation method was followed.…”
Section: Field Installationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Based on the available literature, 3.05 m (10 ft) and 2.44 m (8 ft) long RPP had been utilized to resist the shallow slope failure where the failure depth generally ranged between 0.9 m (3 ft) to 1.8 m (6 ft) . In addition, the 3.65 m (12 ft) long RPP has the possibility to be installed in the slope using available installation method suggested by Sommers et al (2000) and Khan et al (2013). Therefore, the 3.65 m (12 ft), 3.05 m (10 ft) and 2.44 m (8 ft) long RPP is selected for the parametric study.…”
Section: Parametric Study: Effect Of Spacing and Depth Of Rppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slope is located over highway US 287 near St. Paul overpass in Midlothian, Texas. The detail of the study is presented in Khan et al (2013). During the current study, the slope over US 287 is selected as a reference slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%