2022
DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2021.3075383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Amplitude and Phase Respiratory Gating Methods on Continuous-Bed-Motion Whole-Body PET Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Anzai trace, the PET data were sorted into five gates using the amplitude-based equal count method (Dawood et al 2007) for the single-bed datasets. The phase gating method was used for CBM datasets instead, as it is more reliable than the amplitude-based methods in the presence of breathing pattern variability during CBM acquisition (Tsai et al 2022). The same number of respiratory gates was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Anzai trace, the PET data were sorted into five gates using the amplitude-based equal count method (Dawood et al 2007) for the single-bed datasets. The phase gating method was used for CBM datasets instead, as it is more reliable than the amplitude-based methods in the presence of breathing pattern variability during CBM acquisition (Tsai et al 2022). The same number of respiratory gates was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%