2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacsc.2020.100121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of an optimized PID controller for propofol and remifentanil coadministration in general anesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as it has been shown that BIS works very well for hypnosis, with different control strategies [56,57]. A model needs further to be identified for linking the opioids' effect to the drug intake, possibly updating for the prediction of drug-toeffect dynamics in the optimization scheme for drug rates during anesthesia [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…as it has been shown that BIS works very well for hypnosis, with different control strategies [56,57]. A model needs further to be identified for linking the opioids' effect to the drug intake, possibly updating for the prediction of drug-toeffect dynamics in the optimization scheme for drug rates during anesthesia [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the attention towards nociception monitoring has been intensively powered by the paradigm shift towards (semi)-automated management of anesthesia delivery [21]. Because no reliable measure of analgesia was clinically accepted yet, multiple-inputs single-output (MISO) control of both propofol and remifentanil were employed [22,23]. Nevertheless, the approach needs to change towards the multiple-inputs multiple-outputs (MIMO) strategies, because clinical anesthesia is a MIMO problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the devised control strategies can be mainly divided into two categories: those based on Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers and those based on Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithms. Regarding PIDbased controllers, different tuning methodologies have been devised [6]- [8] and experimental results have proven the ef-fectiveness of such a kind of approach in the clinical practice [9]- [11]. However, despite the clear advantage of their simplicity, PID controllers have the drawback of being inherently unable to explicitly handle constraints and to optimize the performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control architectures for the MISO case in anaesthesia process have been analyzed in several works over the last few years [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. The effectiveness of classical proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control techniques has been shown in [27,29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control architectures for the MISO case in anaesthesia process have been analyzed in several works over the last few years [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. The effectiveness of classical proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control techniques has been shown in [27,29,30]. Then, sustainability and safety aspects for feedback control have been analyzed in [26,32], where it has been demonstrated that there are clear advantages in the application of automatic controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%