Behavioral Biometrics for Human Identification 2010
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-725-6.ch003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Behavioral Biometric Systems

Abstract: We present, in this chapter, an overview of techniques for the performance evaluation of behavioral biometric systems. The BioAPI standard that defines the architecture of a biometric system is presented in the first part of the chapter. The general methodology for the evaluation of biometric systems is given including statistical metrics, definition of benchmark databases, and subjective evaluation. These considerations rely with the ISO/IEC19795-1 standard describing the biometric performance testing and rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a high probability to be unused). Comparing biometric systems can be realized within three contexts [5] :…”
Section: A General Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…a high probability to be unused). Comparing biometric systems can be realized within three contexts [5] :…”
Section: A General Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They applied their method for creating the database used in their paper, but, sadly, did not make it available. In [5], we argue that to create a good behavioural biometric database the number of required sessions have to be superior or equal to three, that these sessions must be spaced in time, the population must be large and diversified. These requirements were not always fit in previous researches.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then different approaches for studying the problem have been proposed with varying experimental setups and conclusions. It is not until recently, with the emerging data mining algorithms, that methods for establishing a performance comparative framework between those techniques are investigated [13]. Various approaches in the literature have differed in the size of the collected data per user, number of samples, method of collecting data, number of users, environment conditions (controlled or non-controlled) and the choice of classification method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of the newer benchmarks have respected constraints on the way of creating good behavioral biometrics databases (in terms of number of sessions, duration between each session, number of individuals and so on [Cherifi et al, 2009]). In this section, we present the list of existing benchmarks from the state-of-the-art.…”
Section: • Synthetic Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%