Performance Evaluation of Carbon‐Based Printed Perovskite Solar Cells under Low‐Light Intensity Conditions

Performance Evaluation of Printable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Solar Cells Infiltrated with Reusable CsPbI3:EuCl3 and Standard AVA‐MAPbI3

“…For this reason, better 0.9 performances can be achieved by infiltrating perovskite through automatic semi-continuous dispensing processes [19,24] or inkjet method. [36,37] As a matter of fact, ref. [22], in addition to drop casting, reports on inkjet procedure applied to large area devices (150 mm 2 ) and shows a PCE of 7.3% with AVA-MAPbI 3 (no bump without humidity thermal treatment).…”

Super‐Droplet‐Repellent Carbon‐Based Printable Perovskite Solar Cells

“…[2] These cells offer a low-cost and scalable production method, making them a promising photovoltaic (PV) technology for various applications, including grid-scale electricity generation [3][4][5][6][7] and integration into light-harvesting systems for indoor environments. [8][9][10] However, despite these advancements, PSCs currently face challenges related to long-term operational stability [11][12][13] under diverse environmental conditions, largely attributed to the degradation of hybrid metal halide perovskite light absorbers when exposed to moisture. [14][15][16][17][18][19] Efforts to address moisture-related degradation in PSCs have focused on encapsulation methods or incorporating moisture barrier layers.…”