2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2015.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
530
0
32

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,081 publications
(563 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
530
0
32
Order By: Relevance
“…LOOCV could be carried out in two manners: global and local LOOCV. In both frameworks, each known miRNA-disease association was left in turn as a test sample and other known miRNA-disease associations were regarded as training samples[37]. The only difference between global LOOCV and local LOOCV was that whether all the diseases were investigated simultaneously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LOOCV could be carried out in two manners: global and local LOOCV. In both frameworks, each known miRNA-disease association was left in turn as a test sample and other known miRNA-disease associations were regarded as training samples[37]. The only difference between global LOOCV and local LOOCV was that whether all the diseases were investigated simultaneously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each original dataset was divided into test and validation sets in proportion 9:1 with 10-fold cross-validation, which is widely accepted in data mining and machine learning community and serves as a standard procedure of validation [15]- [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the remaining point data, a different interpolation method is used to compute the simulation value by combining the calculating error of the observed value [25][26][27].…”
Section: Cross Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%