2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2013.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of concentrating solar photovoltaic and photovoltaic/thermal systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An asymmetric compound parabolic photovoltaic thermal concentrator was designed and fabricated by Chaabane et al (2013).The electrical and thermal performance of the system showed higher electrical and thermal output when compared to the asymmetric compound parabolic photovoltaic concentrator system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An asymmetric compound parabolic photovoltaic thermal concentrator was designed and fabricated by Chaabane et al (2013).The electrical and thermal performance of the system showed higher electrical and thermal output when compared to the asymmetric compound parabolic photovoltaic concentrator system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chaabane et al [97] also designed and tested an asymmetrical CPC-LCPVT system for a given spring climatic condition of the Tunisian Saharan city Tozeur. Compared to the CPV system, although the hybrid system was simplified and cost-reduced, the combined thermal and electrical efficiency still reached 26%.…”
Section: Compound Parabolic Concentratormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solar PV module attached to an aluminum absorber produced higher output density [27], while the use of copper radiator to attach a smaller PV module to a larger metal absorber produced a 10% increase in power output [28]. Higher electrical performance in a PV/T system can be obtained by cooling the PV cells [29], by positioning it at the inlet of the flat plate collector [30] and by using reflectors [31]. In India, the overall thermal energy and exergy gain are highest for Bengaluru [32], while the energy payback time (EPBT) and CO 2 emissions of a 1 m 2 PV/T water collector were analyzed to be 7.54 years and 37.24 kg/year respectively [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%