2019 SoutheastCon 2019
DOI: 10.1109/southeastcon42311.2019.9020439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Round Robin Algorithms for CPU Scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common of the preemptive scheduling algorithms is the RR scheduling [5], known hereafter as Standard RR (SRR), used in timesharing and real-time operating systems [6]. In RR scheduling, the operating system is driven by a regular interrupt by the system timer after a short fixed interval called standard time slice (STS) [7][8][9][10]. After that interruption, the scheduler switches the context to the next process selected from the circular queue [11,12].…”
Section: Cpu Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common of the preemptive scheduling algorithms is the RR scheduling [5], known hereafter as Standard RR (SRR), used in timesharing and real-time operating systems [6]. In RR scheduling, the operating system is driven by a regular interrupt by the system timer after a short fixed interval called standard time slice (STS) [7][8][9][10]. After that interruption, the scheduler switches the context to the next process selected from the circular queue [11,12].…”
Section: Cpu Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the proposed algorithm gives a process more time in the current and successive rounds according to the condition in Eq. (10). The comparison was done between the proposed algorithm and six common algorithms from the point of view of waiting time, turnaround time, and NCS.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processes are selected in a fixed sequence for execution [8]. A process receiving CPU service is interrupted by the system timer after a short fixed interval called time slice which usually is much shorter than the CPU service period (or CPU burst) of the process [9][10][11]. After that interruption, the scheduler performs a context switch to the next process selected from the ready queue which is treated as a circular queue [12,13].…”
Section: Cpu Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study compares four RR algorithms: Adaptive RR algorithm, best time quantum RR CPU scheduling, optimal RR scheduling using the Manhattan distance algorithm, and improved RR scheduling algorithm. Four performance indicators were used to compare these algorithms: the amount of context switching (NCS), average waiting time (AWT), average turnaround time (ATT), and average response time (ART) [23]. The simulation results show that both the adaptive RR and optimal RR scheduling using Manhattan distance algorithms are more effective to use because they report the lowest performance factor values [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four performance indicators were used to compare these algorithms: the amount of context switching (NCS), average waiting time (AWT), average turnaround time (ATT), and average response time (ART) [23]. The simulation results show that both the adaptive RR and optimal RR scheduling using Manhattan distance algorithms are more effective to use because they report the lowest performance factor values [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%