2009
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2009.060772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of efficient and reliable routing protocols for fixed-power sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The routing protocols included QoS [9], Speed [9], GBR [7], LAR [10], LBAR [10], AODVjr [10], BVR [8], DD [11], and EAR [7]. Denoting the node count in a WSN as n nodes , analysis of empirical data shows that p delivery decreases when the value of n nodes increases.…”
Section: Reduced Complexity Simulator Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The routing protocols included QoS [9], Speed [9], GBR [7], LAR [10], LBAR [10], AODVjr [10], BVR [8], DD [11], and EAR [7]. Denoting the node count in a WSN as n nodes , analysis of empirical data shows that p delivery decreases when the value of n nodes increases.…”
Section: Reduced Complexity Simulator Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Packet Latency (PL) is the time taken by a data packet to travel from a source sensor node to the sink [16] is given by Eq. (13).…”
Section: Calculation Of Packet Latencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we relieve the difficulties in performance analysis by considering specific cases and imposing practical assumptions in order to observe the effects of the number of hops on the estimation performance. At first, we consider a fixed transmission power, that is, [20][21][22]. Moreover, we restrict our concerns to the particular cases where the noise variance is the same, that is, 2 [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Analysis Of Mse Performancementioning
confidence: 99%