Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (delete if not FOUO)ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY)
March 2016
REPORT TYPE
Technical Note
DATES COVERED (From
SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)
NAWC
SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)
DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
ABSTRACTThe US Army Research Laboratory was tasked with evaluating hazardous air pollutant (HAP)-free alternative paint strippers for validation to Federal Specification TT-R-2918A. One of the major obstacles in finding suitable "drop-in" replacements for methylene chloride is that most HAP-free products have been known to have slower paint removal times. Strip time and performance are important considerations in high-volume operations. The results presented in this report represent the performance of the HAP-free strippers versus a control formula remover in accordance with procedures outlined in Federal Specification TT-R-2918A on both Navy and Army coating systems. The results indicate that some of the alternative strippers performed well compared with the control and the methylene-chloride-based product. One product had performance comparable to that of methylene chloride, removing nearly 100% of all paint layers from the test panels. Depending on the stripping application and coating systems, some of the products tested are considered viable alternatives to methylene chloride strippers.
SUBJECT TERMSmethylene choride, depainting, paint stripping, hazardous air pollutant, TT-R-2918A iii Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.