2006
DOI: 10.21236/ada451375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Hap-Free Paint Strippers vs. Methylene-Chloride-Based Strippers for Removing Army Chemical Agent Resistant Coatings (CARC)

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Informat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Additionally, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommends that exposure to methylene chloride in the workplace be limited to the lowest feasible limit, and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists recommends a workplace exposure limit of 50 ppm averaged over an 8-hr day. 4 The effects of methylene chloride are not limited to the health implications caused in the workplace. It has also been identified as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP) by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Additionally, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommends that exposure to methylene chloride in the workplace be limited to the lowest feasible limit, and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists recommends a workplace exposure limit of 50 ppm averaged over an 8-hr day. 4 The effects of methylene chloride are not limited to the health implications caused in the workplace. It has also been identified as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP) by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%