2019
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2019.1572201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of intermittently CFRP wrapped square and circularised square reinforced concrete columns under different loading conditions

Abstract: Performance evaluation of intermittently CFRP wrapped square and circularised Performance evaluation of intermittently CFRP wrapped square and circularised square reinforced concrete columns under different loading conditions square reinforced concrete columns under different loading conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of failure for the column specimens, with and without simultaneous sustained concentric axial load and reinforcement corrosion, were demonstrated in Figure 8 . As can be seen from Figure 8 , irrespective of different degrees of reinforcement corrosion or sustained loading conditions, the failure of RC columns was basically due to the spalling of the concrete cover around the mid-height, followed by the buckling of the main rebar [ 52 , 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The characteristics of failure for the column specimens, with and without simultaneous sustained concentric axial load and reinforcement corrosion, were demonstrated in Figure 8 . As can be seen from Figure 8 , irrespective of different degrees of reinforcement corrosion or sustained loading conditions, the failure of RC columns was basically due to the spalling of the concrete cover around the mid-height, followed by the buckling of the main rebar [ 52 , 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the specimens tested were summarized in Table 3 . The ductility ( D ) of the column specimens was determined by Equation (2) [ 52 , 53 , 55 ]: where ξ 0.85 is the axial deformation corresponded to the 85% of the ultimate axial load in the descending part of the axial load–axial deformation response, and ξ y is the yield axial deformation which is determined as the axial deformation corresponded to the intersection point of two lines. One is the extension line between the origin and the point representing 75% of the ultimate axial load in the ascending part of the axial load–axial deformation response.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ductility (μ) of the specimens was calculated as the ratio of the ultimate axial deformation or midspan deflection (∆ u ) to the yield axial deformation or midspan deflection (∆ y ), in accordance with Hadi et al 26 and Mai et al 39 The ∆ y was considered at the intersection between a best‐fit regression line corresponding to the ascending part of the load‐deformation curve and a horizontal line corresponding to Peak‐1 load. For the steel‐HC specimens, the ∆ u was considered corresponding to the 85% drop in the Peak‐1 load at the descending branch of the curve.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mai et al [87] presented the results of an experimental investigation on square and circularized square RC columns intermittently wrapped with CFRP jackets under different loading conditions. Twelve RC specimens consisting of eight square RC specimens with a 150-mm × 150-mm cross-section and an 800-mm height and four circularized square RC columns with a 212-mm diameter and an 800-mm height were tested under a concentric axial load, eccentric axial load and four-point flexural load.…”
Section: Section Circularization and Section Ellipticalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%