IET International Conference on Technologies for Active and Assisted Living (TechAAL) 2015
DOI: 10.1049/ic.2015.0142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of joint angles obtained by the Kinect v2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Kinect V1 also provided a seated tracking mode that was conceived to simplify and optimize seated positions, which is not implemented in Kinect V2. A study revealed some limitations in detecting specific postures and body angles [ 53 ], but such angles are not investigated in this study. Authors did not notice remarkable difference between standing and seating while executing upper limb tasks, and the tracking was always adequate, considering that only upper limb data were considered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kinect V1 also provided a seated tracking mode that was conceived to simplify and optimize seated positions, which is not implemented in Kinect V2. A study revealed some limitations in detecting specific postures and body angles [ 53 ], but such angles are not investigated in this study. Authors did not notice remarkable difference between standing and seating while executing upper limb tasks, and the tracking was always adequate, considering that only upper limb data were considered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Skeletal model provided by the Software Development Kit (SDK) consisting of the 3D locations of 25 joints [ 37 ]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devices based on RGBdepth sensors, such as the Kinect (Microsoft), with embedded skeleton tracking algorithms, are nowadays available [42,8]. Yet, the Kinect was shown relevant for general purpose applications, where accuracy and speed are less crucial, and is still considered as not reliable and accurate enough for quantifying human motion (RMSD < 10deg) [104]. More recently, marker-less MCSs based on an RGB camera and a machine learning algorithm were applied to much further challenging scenes with multiple persons tracking [105,106].…”
Section: Marker-less Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%