2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of optimal PI controller for ALSTOM gasifier during coal quality variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The treatment was carried out as per full factorial design as given in Table 1. Five aqueous solutions of varying concentration (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10%) were prepared, and the fibers were soaked in the prepared solution for various period of time (12,24,36,48, and 60 h). After each interval of time, the fibers were taken out from the solution and rinsed with dilute hydrochloric acid to remove any excess potassium hydroxide sticking over the fiber surface.…”
Section: Fiber Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment was carried out as per full factorial design as given in Table 1. Five aqueous solutions of varying concentration (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10%) were prepared, and the fibers were soaked in the prepared solution for various period of time (12,24,36,48, and 60 h). After each interval of time, the fibers were taken out from the solution and rinsed with dilute hydrochloric acid to remove any excess potassium hydroxide sticking over the fiber surface.…”
Section: Fiber Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is seen that MOPSO based baseline PI controller provides better response for wide range of coal quality variations as compared to the existing methods [11,17,[23][24][25]28]. T gas ↓ WStm ↓ Table 8: Comparison of allowed coal quality variation (%).…”
Section: Coal Variation (Model Error)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design and implementation of advanced control schemes are also reported in the literature [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Soft computing techniques such as Bat algorithm, Cuckoo search, Nondominated Sorting Genetic algorithm II, Multiobjective Genetic algorithm, and Normalized Normal Constraint algorithm are also found in the literature [6,7], [22][23][24][25][26][27][28], which deals with tuning of baseline PI controller. Cuckoo search algorithm [24] and Bat algorithm [25] are used to retune a portion of baseline PI controller (pressure loop PI controller) since the baseline PI controller did not satisfy PGAS constraints at 0% load for sinusoidal pressure disturbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8, No. 5;2014 Figure 9. Output and Input response for +18% coal quality change with sinusoidal disturbance for 100% load Figure 10.…”
Section: Sinusoidal Disturbance Coupled With Coal Quality Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%