Geo-Congress 2019 2019
DOI: 10.1061/9780784482124.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Pavement Subgrade by In Situ Moisture and Matric Suction Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The moisture variation at this level is restricted because of fully saturated condition. The observed minimal variation of moisture values for deep seated sensors is comparable to the observations made by References [24] and [13]. The sensors installed at 4 ft and 8 ft showed decline in moisture values in spite of the increase in precipitation by 3.6 inches.…”
Section: Moisture Variation In Edge Borehole Of Sh 342supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The moisture variation at this level is restricted because of fully saturated condition. The observed minimal variation of moisture values for deep seated sensors is comparable to the observations made by References [24] and [13]. The sensors installed at 4 ft and 8 ft showed decline in moisture values in spite of the increase in precipitation by 3.6 inches.…”
Section: Moisture Variation In Edge Borehole Of Sh 342supporting
confidence: 88%
“…This identified the period as the wet season. Reference [24] also identified the same period from November to April as wet period comparing the rainfall and evapotranspiration data. In the other hand, the dry season from May to October gave the resistivity value as high as 23 Ohm m. The moisture variation was found to follow the seasonal trend, which the moisture sensors were unable to capture.…”
Section: Moisture Variation In Subgrade By Resistivitymentioning
confidence: 99%