2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.phycom.2013.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of random linear network coding using a Vandermonde matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, K } are chosen to be different. This guarantees that rank of G t is K , and can also be shown that no performance loss will occur when compared to a randomly chosen G t [36] (this procedure can only be used in the s t x node). Note that since an entire row of a Vandermonde matrix can be constructed using a single non-zero field element, this effectively compresses the coefficient header to just one coefficient as compared to K coefficients.…”
Section: A Cllc: Cooperative Link Layer Controlmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…, K } are chosen to be different. This guarantees that rank of G t is K , and can also be shown that no performance loss will occur when compared to a randomly chosen G t [36] (this procedure can only be used in the s t x node). Note that since an entire row of a Vandermonde matrix can be constructed using a single non-zero field element, this effectively compresses the coefficient header to just one coefficient as compared to K coefficients.…”
Section: A Cllc: Cooperative Link Layer Controlmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Since the above Lemma can be satisfied easily by the VNs containing a high number of relays, we now focus on how to select the optimal VNs containing the full original packet recovery capability with the lowest decoding complexity. The decoding of the recoded packets p ReF C RVij is given in (2) and in order to minimize the calculation complexity of the decoding, the dimension of the product of decoding and recoding matrices should be minimized, as described below…”
Section: The Proposed Opportunistic Fountain Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be argued that for networks with larger number of nodes, or with a significant packet error rate (PER), a more effective solution would be to use linear network coding (LNC) techniques, which are able to encode multiple messages into single messages . In the literature, there are some works dealing with the reduction of encoding/decoding complexity . Nevertheless, the remaining question is whether commercially available WSN nodes are able (or not) to handle complex LNC encoding/decoding operations, using larger field sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%