Performance evaluation of reliable multicast transport protocol for large-scale delivery

Shiroshita, Teruji; Sano, Tsuyoshi; Takahashi, Osamu; Yamashita, Masahide; Yamanouchi, Nagatsugu; Kushida, Takayuki

doi:10.1007/978-0-387-34986-2_11

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One-to-many (star-based) reliable multicast protocols*Reliable Multicast Transport Protocol (RMTP-J A ) [64]; Multicast Dissemination Protocol (MDP/MDPv2) [45]; Reliable Multicast data Distribution Protocol (RMDP) [20,65]; Multicast Transport Protocol (MTP) [66]; Multicast File Transfer Protocol (MFTP, MFTP/EC) [16,37]; Adaptive File Distribution Protocol (AFDP) [67,68]*aggregate receivers based on a single-hop (star-based) structure to attain reliability (see Figure 2). This class of protocols are suited for one-to-many topologies that utilize less of the intermediate network elements (i.e.…”

Section: One-to-many (Star-based) Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliable multicast via satellite: a comparison survey and taxonomy

Koyabe

Fairhurst

2001

Int. J. Satell. Commun.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYIP multicasting is an important service, which will be provided by the next generation Internet. A range of applications has emerged which take the advantage of multicast delivery. However, several factors currently hinder large-scale deployment of terrestrial multicast services. It is particularly di$cult to support delivery to large groups of users.Satellites o!er a natural way to extend the multicast service to reach this large number of users. They may o!er high capacity (especially when using next generation satellite systems) and also eliminate the need for a large number of intermediate routing hops. There are important di!erences in the way multicast applications operate over satellite. This paper therefore reviews the key design paradigm and o!ers a critical comparison between di!erent reliable multicast protocol techniques based on a taxonomy. The suitability of a set of the most common reliable multicast protocols is assessed within a satellite environment and conclusions are presented.

show abstract

Section: One-to-many (Star-based) Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliable multicast via satellite: a comparison survey and taxonomy

Koyabe

Fairhurst

2001

Int. J. Satell. Commun.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2 In ACK-based protocols 57, 56, 28, 48, 63 , the receivers send messages acknowledging the reception of messages. In NACK-based protocols 23,14,18,29,55 , the receivers do not acknowledge the reception of messages; instead, they send messages indicating that a message has not been received. FEC-based protocols 60, 47, 51 place redundant information in every message that they send, allowing the receivers to recover a subset of messages that they do not receive.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

The intergroup protocols: Scalable group communication for the internet

Berket¹,

Moser²

2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PUBLICATIONS A group communication protocol for CORBA," with L. E. Moser, P. M . ABSTRACT The InterGroup Protocols: Scalable Group Communication for the Internet by Karlo BerketReliable group ordered delivery of multicast messages in a distributed system is a useful service that simpli es the programming of distributed applications. Such a service helps to maintain the consistency of replicated information and to coordinate the activities of the various processes. With the increasing popularity of the Internet, there is an increasing interest in scaling the protocols that provide this service to the environment of the Internet. The InterGroup protocol suite, described in this dissertation, provides such a service, and is intended for the environment of the Internet with scalability t o large numbers of nodes and high latency links.The InterGroup protocols approach the scalability problem from various directions. They rede ne the meaning of group membership, allow v oluntary membership changes, add a receiver-oriented selection of delivery guarantees that permits heterogeneity of the receiver set, and provide a scalable reliability service.The InterGroup system comprises several components, executing at various sites within the system. Each component provides part of the services necessary to implement a group communication system for the wide-area. The components can be categorized as: 1 control hierarchy, 2 reliable multicast, 3 message distribution and delivery, and 4 process group membership.We h a v e implemented a prototype of the InterGroup protocols in Java, and have tested the system performance in both local-area and wide-area networks.vii viii 1

show abstract

“…The implementation of RMTP for real delivery services has been based on the performance evaluation of the protocol and its application to the operation functions. Performance evaluation has been conducted through design and implementation of RMTP [3]. The estimation scheme for contents delivery has been also implemented in an upper layer delivery control function which schedules contents delivery timing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Reliable Multicast Applications for Large-Scale Contents Delivery

Shiroshita¹,

Kinoshita²,

Nagata³

et al. 2007

IEICE Transactions on Communications

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reliable Multicast has been applied to large-scale contents delivery systems for distributing digital contents to a large number of users without data loss. Performance evaluation of reliable multicast is useful for delivery time estimation in active delivery systems as well as for designing communication protocols and systems. This paper evaluates the implementation and performance of RMTP; a reliable multicast protocol for bulk-data transfer for several types of contents delivery services. System configuration is examined including operation function such as delivery scheduling based on performance evaluation. Furthermore, research issues are discussed when reliable multicast is applied to emerging broadband network services.

show abstract

Performance evaluation of reliable multicast transport protocol for large-scale delivery

Cited by 8 publications

References 14 publications

Reliable multicast via satellite: a comparison survey and taxonomy

Reliable multicast via satellite: a comparison survey and taxonomy

The intergroup protocols: Scalable group communication for the internet

Evaluation of Reliable Multicast Applications for Large-Scale Contents Delivery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About